On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Charles McCathieNevile cha...@opera.com wrote:
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/
I've been meaning to read this for months. sorry for the delay, i
expect none of my comments are significant, but i enjoy reading and
writing
This specification
Following up to a mail from May 2008:
Julian Reschke wrote:
Sunava Dutta wrote:
...
At this point, I'm not sure why we're bothering with XHR1 at all. It is
*not* what the current implementations do anyway.
[Sunava Dutta] I'm sorry, this statement is concerning and I'd like to
understand it
Hello.
I'm following the specs evolving for Window Modes
(http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#window-modes).
Given the fact that the content tag has an occurrence of 0 or 1, and the
fact that the mode is one, my question is:
- Would it be possible to have widgets that have multiple views?
I
timeless wrote:
This specification introduces two methods that take a group of selectors
it requires a script like the following that iterates
that = which ?
No, that is correct in this case.
With these methods, it is easier to match a set of Element nodes
based on specific criteria.
After renaming the specification I decided to go through the normative
parts of the specification again to clean various things up and resolve
some outstanding issues. Since the October 6 editor's draft (last
relatively stable draft) the following things have changed starting
January 14:
On 9 Feb 2009, at 13:57, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
* There was a logic error in the cache processing model.
I wonder whether that part of the spec is actually being implemented
(or found useful by implementors).
If not, I'm all for dropping it.
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C t...@w3.org
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:25:37 +0100, Thomas Roessler t...@w3.org wrote:
On 9 Feb 2009, at 13:57, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
* There was a logic error in the cache processing model.
I wonder whether that part of the spec is actually being implemented (or
found useful by implementors).
If
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:25:37 +0100, Thomas Roessler t...@w3.org
wrote:
On 9 Feb 2009, at 13:57, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
* There was a logic error in the cache processing model.
I wonder whether that part of the spec is actually being
implemented (or found useful by implementors).
If
Hi All,
The W3C's XBL2 Candidate spec [1] was published almost two years ago.
Since then, there has been some implementation activity reported
(e.g. [2],[3]) but nothing recently.
Does anyone have XBL2 implementation status they can share with us?
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]
Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi All,
The W3C's XBL2 Candidate spec [1] was published almost two years ago.
Since then, there has been some implementation activity reported (e.g.
[2],[3]) but nothing recently.
Does anyone have XBL2 implementation status they can share with us?
I don't yet have
There are a few active JS implementation projects:
xbl.googlecode.com, see http://code.google.com/p/xbl/wiki/Features
dojo.E has some support, see:
http://blog.nexaweb.com/post/xbl-support-for-all-browsers-via-dojoe/
XBLUI, see: http://meekostuff.net/projects/XBLUI/status.html
XBLUI (my
Hey Julian!
Thanks for your mail. I'm adding my x-teammates from IE who should be able to
help you here. FYI I've transitioned over to our Online Services Group here at
MS!
All the best!
-Original Message-
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.resc...@gmx.de]
Sent: Monday, February 09,
12 matches
Mail list logo
