Fwd: Last Call for comments on Selectors (css3-selectors)

Selectors fans - the CSS WG published a LCWD of the Selectors spec; comments due April 7: Begin forwarded message: From: ext Bert Bos Date: March 11, 2009 3:05:24 PM EDT Subject: Last Call for comments on Selectors (css3-selectors) T

[D3E] Draft minutes from 11 March 2009 telcon

The Draft minutes from the DOM 3 Events Voice Conference are available at the following and copied below: The next D3E voice conference is 18 March. -Regards, Art Barstow [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/

Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format

Hi everyone, Here's a sample of our widget gallery output from Wookie - again not as a proposition but just to share an example of the sort of content that tends to be included in these cases. (Note in our system the client requests an instance of a widget using the widget identifier, whi

Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format

On Mar 11, 2009, at 16:44 , Jon Ferraiolo wrote: How about adopting OpenSearch response? http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#OpenSearch_response_elements In fact, how about simply adopting OpenSearch in its entirety? Well my understanding of the use case is that it's abou

Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format

How about adopting OpenSearch response? http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#OpenSearch_response_elements In fact, how about simply adopting OpenSearch in its entirety? Jon Robin Berjon

Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format

On Mar 11, 2009, at 14:14 , SUZANNE Benoit RD-SIRP-ISS wrote: I do not consider the following as a formal format proposition but as an input to open the discussion as it should probably be written in atom instead of RSS. Yes, and it should introduce as few new elements as possible. Off the

[widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names

Might be good if we allow multiple screenshots in a widget. One screenshot is just not enough to show off all aspects of a widget that would motivate someone to download a widget. The file naming convention would be identical to the Widgets Signatures file naming convention: thumbnail.jpg thumbnai

Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:14 PM, SUZANNE Benoit RD-SIRP-ISS wrote: > All, > Based on our last F2F, we have talked about an RSS like file format that > would standardise the widget list for various needs. I do not consider the > following as a formal format proposition but as an input to open the >

Re: Small question about latest version of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:49 PM, wrote: > Hello Marcos, All. > > I see that there is a new version of the P&C specs available. > Is the fact that now there is no viewmode definition tag only temporary? > > I remember something defined during the F2F in Paris that looked like: >     mode="bl

[Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format

All, Based on our last F2F, we have talked about an RSS like file format that would standardise the widget list for various needs. I do not consider the following as a formal format proposition but as an input to open the discussion as it should probably be written in atom instead of RSS. So here

Small question about latest version of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)

Hello Marcos, All. I see that there is a new version of the P&C specs available. Is the fact that now there is no viewmode definition tag only temporary? I remember something defined during the F2F in Paris that looked like: Is it going to go in a next update or something? Regards <> Ivan D

Re: [widgets] Agenda for 12 March 2009 Voice Conference; *** NOTE TIME CHANGE FOR non-US ***

Regrets, in a meeting. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C On 10 Mar 2009, at 19:09, Arthur Barstow wrote: Below is the draft agenda for the March 12 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion before the meeting on all of the agenda topics via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can re

Re: comments on Packaging and Configuration specification

I hereby formally rejoice in the disposition in my comments. Max. Marcos Caceres writes: > Hi Max, > Thanks for the prompt reply. I think I have addressed all of your > concerns. For the sake of the LC process, can you give us a final > thumbs up that you are happy with the changes. > > On Tue,