Hi, Arun-
Arun Ranganathan wrote (on 6/25/09 1:38 AM):
On Jun 23, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
The Web Storage specification is someone dead-locked right now due
to the lack of consensus on whether to use SQL or not.
This topic continues to be discussed in Mozilla newsgroups. Few
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Doug Schepers wrote:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
The Web Storage specification is someone dead-locked right now due to the
lack of consensus on whether to use SQL or not.
I don't buy this argument for an instant, and I'd be very surprised if
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Adam Barthw...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Bil Corryb...@corry.biz wrote:
Continuing your example, if XHTML defines requests from form as
privacy-sensitive, then the UA will have two different behaviors for
Sec-From, depending on if
Cameron McCormack:
From some very brief testing, it seems that Firefox and Opera tend
to throw an exception when calling a method with too few arguments,
while IE, Safari and Chrome will assume that the missing arguments
were the undefined value.
Simon Pieters:
Hmm. What did you use as
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:50:32 +0200, Bil Corry b...@corry.biz wrote:
Continuing your example, if XHTML defines requests from form as
privacy-sensitive, then the UA will have two different behaviors for
Sec-From, depending on if it's rendering HTML5 or XHTML?
HTML5 defines an XHTML
Hi Cameron,
Following our conversation on the geolocation ML
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2009Jun/0173.html
I have the following clarification request related to the Web IDL spec.
In the geolocation spec we have now:
[NoInterfaceObject]
interface PositionOptions {
Using http://bondi.omtp.org/1.0/security/xmldsig-core-schema.rnc and
rnv [1] I've been trying to validate the example:
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/#example
Firstly does widgets-digsig have it's own grammar.rnc? I have not been
able to find one.
Using xmldsig-core-schema.rnc I ran into a
Last minute changes in schedule prevented me from attending. Sorry for
late regretts.
Andy
Jonas Sicking wrote on 6/25/2009 2:11 AM:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Adam Barthw...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Bil Corryb...@corry.biz wrote:
Continuing your example, if XHTML defines requests from form as
privacy-sensitive, then the UA will have two
Nikunj, All,
Charles will respond separately regarding a way forward but I want to
respond to the false accusation below.
On Jun 24, 2009, at 8:13 PM, ext Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
The WG chair went ahead with the publication of the Web Storage draft
overriding serious objections about it's
On Jun 25, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
The draft minutes from the June 25 Widgets Security voice conference
are available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/05/25-wam-minutes.html
The correct URI is:
What about too many arguments, and ignoring extra ones? Is that settled?
-- Darin
I have listed these requirements on my blog -
http://o-micron.blogspot.com/2009/06/requirements-for-and-components-needed.html
I will put these together in a forma suitable for W3C uses.
Nikunj
http://o-micron.blogspot.com
On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Arun-
Arun
On Jun 24, 2009, at 7:34 PM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.com, 2009-06-24 17:13 -0700:
I want to raise two formal points of order about the manner in
which this WG
has operated, particularly in respect to Web Storage.
1. Charter
2. Process
Firstly, no one
On Jun 24, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Nikunj-
I think Mike was overly blunt, but essentially correct in his
response, but I'd like to add a specific comment inline...
Nikunj R. Mehta wrote (on 6/24/09 8:13 PM):
On Jun 23, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
The Web
Kai
XML Signature 1.1 is specified using XML Schema [1]. XML Signature
1.1 has a draft RNG schema [2]. We did not develop an rnc grammar for
widget signature.
The XML Security WG started to work on an XML Signature 1.1 RNG schema
[2] but since we do not have deep expertise in the group
On Jun 25, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Nikunj, All,
Charles will respond separately regarding a way forward but I want
to respond to the false accusation below.
On Jun 24, 2009, at 8:13 PM, ext Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
The WG chair went ahead with the publication of the Web
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Bil Corryb...@corry.biz wrote:
Jonas Sicking wrote on 6/25/2009 2:11 AM:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Adam Barthw...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Bil Corryb...@corry.biz wrote:
Continuing your example, if XHTML defines requests from
On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
In any case, adding a new feature to a spec whose future is uncertain
isn't a good idea because it means that the new feature's progress
is tied
to the uncertain future of the rest of the spec. Thus, my
recommendation
to Nikunj would be to
On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
I think Nikunj's proposal definitely is worthy of being persued,
just like
the working group is persuing dozens of other proposals like XHR,
CORS,
Selectors API, Workers, Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets, etc. I don't
believe it really
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Nikunj R.
Mehtanikunj.me...@oracle.com wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
I have proposed to Mozilla a solution that provides access to an organized
key-value database such as that provided in the (open source) Berkeley DB.
In essence, a
Aaron Boodman:
But there is also an issue of legacy code. I brought this issue up in
a webkit bug awhile ago, and one concern from the webkit developers
was that introducing an exception would almost certainly break
sites. My opinion is that those sites are almost certainly already
broken.
I
Darin Adler:
What about too many arguments, and ignoring extra ones? Is that
settled?
It seems consistent with current implementations to ignore extra
arguments. That approach might go against the desire to maximise the
freedom API designers have to add additional overloaded operations
later,
Oliver Hunt:
There's also overloaded functions like (for example)
CanvasRenderingContext2d.drawImage
void drawImage(in HTMLImageElement image, in float dx, in float dy,
[Optional] in float dw, in float dh)
if I do drawImage(image, x, y, foo) is this under-provision for
On Jun 25, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Nikunj R.
Mehtanikunj.me...@oracle.com wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
I have proposed to Mozilla a solution that provides access to an
organized
key-value database such as that
25 matches
Mail list logo
