Hi Henri,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>>
>> Ok. I see what you mean. Widget.hasFeature has slightly different
>> semantics (in widgets, it means "did that feature I requested load and
>> become available?"
>
> Which brings up the issue that it's unclear what it means for an
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:31 PM, timeless wrote:
> I wrote:
>> hey, you won't like this, but... I think we botched the
>> l10n stuff :). The problem is that the design is based on individual
>> resources, which is wrong. Negotiation should really be done at the
>> Package level. This is one of those
Final hi! Josh,
Addressed your final set of editorial issues. If satisfied with the
corrections, please give us
an OK for the DoC :)
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:54 PM, timeless wrote:
> Date: Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:52 PM
>
> 4:15 PM me: (e.g., floating and application mode)
>
> either floating mode
Hi Josh,
Fixed all editorial comments below for this third set of comments. If
satisfied with the corrections, please give us
an OK for the DoC :)
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:55 PM, timeless wrote:
> Date: Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:48 PM
>
> 6:36 PM me: (e.g., a user agent could use an array, or an o
Hi Josh,
Addressed your second set of comments below.
If satisfied with the corrections, please give us
an OK for the DoC :)
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, timeless wrote:
> Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:42 AM
>
> 8:42 AM me: A conformance checker (CC) is a user agent that verifies
> if a wid
Hi Josh,
Fixed issues below. If satisfied with the corrections, please give us
an OK for the DoC :)
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, timeless wrote:
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/
>
> Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:52 AM
>
> 2:29 AM me: hey
> suppose that times square becomes widget capabl
2009/6/10 Anne van Kesteren :
> "This means that the user agent must match all elements of a particular type
> whose xml:lang attribute matches the language ranges held by the user agent
> locales." I do not get this definition. Is it about all elements named X
> having an xml:lang attribute tha
Le mardi 30 juin 2009 à 06:26 +, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> However, I do think it'd be nice to have tools to help us check the IDL..
> Could we have a tool that just scans the textContent out of elements
> with class=idl, or something? We could give it the URLs of all the specs
> being develo
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> There is no paragraph preceding the list of steps making it all somewhat
> confusing.
Editorial: I've broken the section up by using s. There are now
two sub sections:
* Terminology Used in Processing Algorithm
* Processing Algorithm
T
I wrote:
> hey, you won't like this, but... I think we botched the
> l10n stuff :). The problem is that the design is based on individual
> resources, which is wrong. Negotiation should really be done at the
> Package level. This is one of those things where thinking HTTPish
> screws you over. A us
Hi Josh,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:26 PM, timeless wrote:
> 9:01 AM me: hey, you won't like this, but... I think we botched the
> l10n stuff :). The problem is that the design is based on individual
> resources, which is wrong. Negotiation should really be done at the
> Package level. This is one o
Hi Cameron,
2009/7/3 Cameron McCormack :
> Cameron McCormack:
>> (OT: Btw. why is WebIDL using the attribute keyword instead of the
>> property keyword if the terminology calls it property?)
>
> They are different things. “Named properties” are name-value pairs that
> are exposed on an object thr
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> The example does not match the prose description. The prose does not say
> anything about using an element without an xml:lang attribute. (Strangely
> enough.)
>
I've added the following prose:
"In the case whereby the author does not u
On 2.7.2009 14.40, "ext Marcos Caceres" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:27 AM, wrote:
>> On 29.6.2009 13.30, "ext Marcos Caceres" wrote:
>> /JK1/ OK, I've checked it and I think it is now easier to find all the
>> relevant stuff. However, the "Localization guidelines" section (now 8.1) is
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
