Hi, Folks-
Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 10/13/09 10:47 PM):
On Oct 13, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
2) How well do cross-origin cookies support the simple use cases of
cross-origin
resource sharing?
As we all now know, many simple use cases are supported well by
cross-origin cookie
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the following document
as Last Call Working Draft #3 of the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and
Configuration spec:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/Overview_TSE.html
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's
decision to reque
Hi Marcos, All,
>>It seems more logical to me to not
>>treat it as an extension. Look at all the .whatever files on your
>>system. I bet you 2 beers that 99% will be text files. And I bet you
>>will ".whatever.ext" will identify a type (like .something.plist).
I actually agree with this argumentat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne van Kesteren writes:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:22:35 +0200, Henry S. Thompson
> wrote:
>> One point of clarification: my (admittedly imperfect) understanding
>> was that the most important parts of CORS have to be implemented
>> _server_-side fo
+1
We could continue discussion during the LC period as usual.
I am sorry for my blackout on the call.
Thanks,
Marcin
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com
-Original Mess
Hi Marcos,
I think we will drink some beer soon :)
>>I understand the rationale, but I don't see it as necessary. Lets just
>>cover what is in the spec. In version 2, if we need to support this
>>later, we can add it easily. It won't break backwards compat because
>>we will just be expanding the
Art and all,
"AB: any other comments on this?
... given we don't consensus on this, we will not be able to publish
a new LC until after the TPAC meeting
... any last comments?
... given this is still an open issue, we will not discuss LC
publication today"
Given that Marci
2009/10/22 Marcin Hanclik :
> Hi Marcos,
>
>>>To be clear: All we want to do is check if the file extension of a
>>>file case-insensitively matches one of the extensions in the File
>>>Identification Table. If you can't match it, then the MIME type gets
>>>resolved with SNIFF.
> Ok, I understand th
Hi Marcos,
>>To be clear: All we want to do is check if the file extension of a
>>file case-insensitively matches one of the extensions in the File
>>Identification Table. If you can't match it, then the MIME type gets
>>resolved with SNIFF.
Ok, I understand the intention of this section.
The ran
2009/10/22 Marcin Hanclik :
> Hi Marcos, All,
>
>>>If any character in the extension is outside the U+0041-U+005A range
>>>and the U+0061-U+007A range, then go to step 7 in this algorithm.
> Unfortunately I disagree with that.
> Motivation:
> a) only ASCII characters are listed
> b) no digits are l
Hi Marcos, All,
>>If any character in the extension is outside the U+0041-U+005A range
>>and the U+0061-U+007A range, then go to step 7 in this algorithm.
Unfortunately I disagree with that.
Motivation:
a) only ASCII characters are listed
b) no digits are listed. What about file extensions that in
The draft minutes from the October 22 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before October 29 (the nex
Please try your signed widgets on http://test.webvm.net/
Example signed widget: http://static.webvm.net/example.wgt
Example root CA: http://bondisdk.limofoundation.org/qa/keys/example.pub
http://bondisdk.limofoundation.org/qa/keys/example.p12 with keystore
password 'secret'
Comments below...
2009/10/21 Arthur Barstow :
> Below is the draft agenda for the October 22 Widgets Voice Conference (VC).
> 3. Packaging and Configuration spec
>
> a. Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDe
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Marcin Hanclik
wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
> These are my remarks as discussed yesterday on the call.
>
> Comment a)
>
> 6.A.If all characters in the extension are outside the two ranges, then go to
> step 5 in this algorithm.
>
> Should be
>
> 6.A.If any of the charac
Hi there,
At the last widgets call I agreed to ask OMTP BONDI members if there was
any feedback on viewmodes. We didn't receive a lot of views but one
thing I raised was that as far as I can tell, there is no text to cover
off invisible widgets or widgets of, for example height and width 1x1.
T
16 matches
Mail list logo
