On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:22:37 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
If you have any comments, please send them to public-bpwg-
comme...@w3.org by March 11 at the latest.
Done:
http://www.w3.org/mid/op.u70gq30u64w...@annevk-t60
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On 11 Feb 2010, at 01:10, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I don't disagree with you on the implementation side (and Im happy
to hear
that you think it can be implemented - I'll keep my fingers
crossed). On the
author side, I honestly don't know how much of a difference it will
make.
I'm sure someone
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:11:40 +0100, Anton Muhin ant...@chromium.org wrote:
Is it possible to allow caching for those cases? Firefox caches those
node lists for a long time (Maciej found the related bug
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:19 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:11:40 +0100, Anton Muhin
ant...@chromium.org wrote:
Is it possible to allow caching for those cases? Firefox caches
those
node lists for a long time (Maciej found the related bug
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:47 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:19 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:11:40 +0100, Anton Muhin
ant...@chromium.org wrote:
Is it possible to allow caching for those cases? Firefox caches
those
node lists for a long time
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:11:40 +0100, Anton Muhin ant...@chromium.org
wrote:
Is it possible to allow caching for those cases? Firefox caches those
node lists for a long time (Maciej found the related bug
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140758). IE8 caches as
well. Opera, Safari
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:51:03 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:47 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:19 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:11:40 +0100, Anton Muhin ant...@chromium.org
wrote:
Is it possible to allow caching
On Feb 10, 2010, at 20:35, John Gregg wrote:
I agree that this is a good distinction, but I think even considering ambient
notifications there is a question of how much interaction should be
supported. NotifyOSD, for example, does not allow the user to take any
action in response to a
Maciej Stachowiak schrieb:
On Jan 29, 2010, at 6:36 AM, Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote:
Arthur Barstow schrieb:
Sebastian, All,
On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:54 AM, ext Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote:
About half a year ago I came up with an idea to add a unique window id
as request header to each
On Feb 12, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:51:03 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak
m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:47 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:19 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:11:40 +0100, Anton Muhin
(Dragging Henri Sivonen in, as he originally raised some of the issues
below and I'm sure he would like to be involved. Also dragging Frederick
Hirsch in, as he co-edited Widgets Dig Sig spec and co-editor of the XML
Signature Syntax and Processing Second Edition)
Scott Wilson wrote:
On 11
Hi all,
our goal in the OASIS DSS group is make the living with DSig as easy as
possible !
That's why we made a spec to easily access a crypto server component by
webservice and forget about signature standards, algorithms, validity dates ...
My company build a open sourced server
Le 11/02/2010 17:33, Robin Berjon a écrit :
Hi Cyril,
On Feb 11, 2010, at 14:03 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 10:22 AM, ext Cyril Concolato wrote:
Dear Mr. Barstow,
We can do so provided you agree to never again call me Mr. Barstow :-).
Yeah, we wouldn't want to anger Mr.
Hi Cyril,
On Feb 12, 2010, at 9:56 AM, ext Cyril Concolato wrote:
Le 11/02/2010 17:33, Robin Berjon a écrit :
We discussed this on the call today and decided that it would be
better if you were around while we discussed it; would it be
possible for you to join our next call?
I would be
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:13:57 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
On Feb 12, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Is it really a lot of performance? Our developers are not that
convinced.
A patch that made the change in WebKit was measured as a 20% speedup on
the Dromaeo
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
FWIW, Microsoft explicitly says notifications must be ignorable and don't
persist. Notifications aren't modal and don't require user interaction, so
users can freely ignore them. In Windows Vista® and later, notifications
On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:13:57 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak
m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Is it really a lot of performance? Our developers are not that
convinced.
A patch that made the change
On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Also, what happens with garbage collection? Say some isolated piece
of code does:
x = document.getElementsByTagName(x)
x.p = 2
... and then later on some other piece of code does:
y = document.getElementsByTagName(x)
w(p in y)
On 2/12/10 8:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Is it really a lot of performance? Our developers are not that convinced.
It depends on your use case.
If you're actually using getElementsByTagName on a largish DOM, then the
performance effect of not having to walk that DOM multiple times is in
On 2/12/10 10:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
It would be interesting to know what exactly that test is. Optimizing
for benchmarks is not always useful :-)
Point 1: Optimizing for benchmarks is sadly all that people report on.
They don't even bother making up new benchmarks, so you can
On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:29 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Test 1: ~4350ms
Test 2: ~2100ms
Test 3: ~80ms
Test 4: ~10ms
and in Opera 10.5 pre alpha:
Test 1: ~520ms
Test 2: ~3809ms
Test 3: ~541ms
Test 4: ~3828ms
and in Safari 4:
Test 1: ~260ms
Test 2: ~1309ms
Test 3: ~131ms (?)
Test 4: ~20ms
Given
Hi, Sebastian-
Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote (on 2/12/10 8:11 AM):
Maciej Stachowiak schrieb:
On Jan 29, 2010, at 6:36 AM, Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote:
Arthur Barstow schrieb:
Sebastian, All,
On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:54 AM, ext Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote:
About half a year ago I came up
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Feb 11, 2010, at 16:07, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
As has been brought up repeatedly, growl and the other notification
engines are used by a SMALL FRACTION of all web users. I suspect a fraction
of a percent. Why are we
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org
Date: February 12, 2010 1:40:53 PM EST
Cc: Dave Raggett d...@w3.org
Subject: W3C Workshop: Future Standards for Model-Based User
Interfaces
Dear Advisory Committee Representative,
I am pleased to announce an upcoming W3C Workshop:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Feb 11, 2010, at 16:07, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
As has been brought up repeatedly, growl and the other notification
engines are used by a SMALL
The XML Security WG is asking WebApps WG for review of the XML
Signature 1.1 and Signature Properties Last Call drafts. Though the
formal deadline is March 18, we would prefer comments in February if
possible.
Some more information:
* Signature 1.1 draft:
On 11 Feb 2010, at 13:08, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:32 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
On Feb 11, 2010, at 05:40 , Doug Schepers wrote:
Scott Wilson wrote (on 2/9/10 10:32 AM):
There are a couple of additional areas it would be useful to
consider
for future work in the
Hi, Scott-
I'm still confused as to what you're asking for as a chartered
deliverable for Widgets.
Like others, I am extremely reluctant to define any special
functionality for Widgets, when it could be useful for Web applications
at large. Let me try to break down some of what you are
Hi WebApps fans!
Working on implementing FormData and ran into a couple of questions.
First of all, I assume that it is intended that a FromData object can
be submitted several times. I.e. that the following code is ok:
fd = new FormData;
fd.append(name1, foo);
xhr1 = new XMLHttpRequest;
29 matches
Mail list logo
