Approved! :) Thanks very much!
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:49 PM, wrote:
>
> Dear Marcos Caceres ,
>
> The XML Security Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on
> the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing
> Version 1.1 published on 3 Mar 2011. Thank
On 8/15/2011 3:31 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
When the db is doing a commit after processing all records on the
transaction, if for some reason it fails, should we produce an error
event first and let the bubbling produce a transaction abort event or
should we only produce a transaction abort event
On 8/3/2011 10:33 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
IndexedDB does however not allow readers to start once a writing
transaction has started. I thought that that was common behavior even
for MVCC databases. Is that not the case? Is it more common that
readers can start whenever and always just see the dat
When the db is doing a commit after processing all records on the transaction,
if for some reason it fails, should we produce an error event first and let the
bubbling produce a transaction abort event or should we only produce a
transaction abort event. It seems that doing the first approach w
On Monday, August 15, 2011 2:22 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 14, 2011 4:09 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >> > Yup. Though I think WebIDL will take care of the handl
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Sunday, August 14, 2011 4:09 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> > Yup. Though I think WebIDL will take care of the handling for when the
>> > author specifies a negative value. I.e. WebID
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13632
Aryeh Gregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
Dear Marcos Caceres ,
The XML Security Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on
the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing
Version 1.1 published on 3 Mar 2011. Thank you for having taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!
The
On 8/15/11 12:27 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:06:30 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
wrote:
On 8/14/11 9:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Why can you not use characters legally allowed in IRIs?
Are you referring to the "permissible charset" for ranges of
characters or the condi
On Sunday, August 14, 2011 4:09 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > Yup. Though I think WebIDL will take care of the handling for when the
> > author specifies a negative value. I.e. WebIDL will specify what
> > exception to throw, so we don't need t
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:06:30 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
wrote:
On 8/14/11 9:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Why can you not use characters legally allowed in IRIs?
Are you referring to the "permissible charset" for ranges of characters
or the condition disallowing reserved characters? I've o
On 8/14/11 8:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
For the HTML dependency it seems this specification depends on event
handler attributes as well.
Agreed.
The Typed Arrays specification should either become a normal
dependency or you need to introduce different conformance classes.
Currently it
On 8/14/11 9:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Why can you not use characters legally allowed in IRIs?
Are you referring to the "permissible charset" for ranges of characters
or the condition disallowing reserved characters? I've only omitted the
ones that should be percent-encoded. Honestly,
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13786
Summary: Drop the charset parameter or made it non-conforming.
Other MIME types introduced by this specification do
not allow the charset parameter.
Product: WebAppsWG
Versi
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:41:32 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
I created http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Modifications based on your email
and the reply from Olli. It probably needs a bit more context.
I will try to contact the relevant people at Opera to see if we have any
input in the matter.
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:21:46 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:06:58 +0200, Adrian Bateman
wrote:
The name was changed. We weren't terribly keen on the change. It is now
causing problems. I've had multiple people contact me confused about
this. We should fix the proble
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13777
Summary: The WebSocket protocol draft (hybi-10) restricts the
value of subprotocols as follows: The elements
that comprise this value MUST be non- empty
strings with c
17 matches
Mail list logo
