Hi All,
With respect to the charter, the SSE snippet currently says:
[[
Server-Sent Events - An API for opening an HTTP connection for receiving
push notifications from a server in the form of DOM events. The API is
designed such that it can be extended to work with other push
notification
Olli has a good point that it makes sense to implement the SpeechAPI in
pieces. That doesn't mean that the WebApps WG only has to look at one
proposal in deciding how to proceed with the work. Another option would be
to start off the Speech API work in the Web Apps group with both proposals
(the
That's exactly the right question to ask. Please take a look at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/htmlspeech/XGR-htmlspeech-20111206/#requirements
I am also in support of Olli's statement that we may not be able to
spec/implement the complete XG recommendation in one pass. But decisions made
On 1/13/12 2:37 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
HTML uses this concept in lots of places, e.g.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#cookie-free-document-object
A Document that has no browsing context.
Ah, that's better than using defaultView (because behavior for
defaultView on
I agree that getting good enough out there sooner is an excellent goal,
although in practice there's always a lot of room for disagreement about
what's good enough.
There isn't a draft priority list now, although the XG final report does
include prioritized requirements [1]. However, the
On 1/13/12 12:18 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
Actually, defaultView is defined to return the Document's browsing
context's WindowProxy object, if it has one, and null otherwise.
Hmm. I guess the spec doesn't really define what happens to the
association between a document and its browsing context
On 1/12/12 12:53 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
Oh I'm glad to see this one! Is it Blob and File that can be put
into
IDB? How do I create a new File (with a name field) from a Blob?
Charles: see the thread on making Blobs constructable -- follow
How prioritization works in practice depends on how a specific Working Group
decides to organize its work, but generally, the W3C is very
consensus-oriented and tries to make sure that all opinions are respected.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Bernard
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
I would prefer a definition that doesn't involve defaultView, actually. I
don't expect browsers to converge defaultView behavior any time in the near
or medium future, so the testability would be illusory: tests would just
On 1/13/12 11:13 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On 1/12/12 12:53 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
Oh I'm glad to see this one! Is it Blob and File that can be
put into IDB? How do I create a new File (with a name field)
from a Blob?
Charles: see the thread on making
That would be bad; it would require null checks that people would forget to
perform due to the rarity of the condition. Instead, it should return a
File that fails when read attempts are made. (Of course, those errors are
also rare, but it's at least not adding a *new* rare case.)
On Jan 13,
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hixie - what are your thoughts on these UCs and how they would be
spec'ed? For example, would they be in a different spec, an L.next type
spec?
Well there's two parts to it: the protocol, and the API. If there's an
existing protocol for this and
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15554
Summary: Hi, The article is very good. Also user can view.
HTML5 Web Workers
http://www.totaldotnet.com/Article/ShowArticle145_HTML
5WebWorker.aspx
Product:
13 matches
Mail list logo
