Marcos would like to publish a Proposed Edited Recommendation [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the
spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
The [Errata] has already been reflected in the [Proposed-PER] (see
[Diff]) and it includes a
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:26:44 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
Marcos would like to publish a Proposed Edited Recommendation [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the
spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
Hi All,
Earlier today, Hixie added ArrayBuffer back to the WebSocket API ED (see
[r1.272]) as requested in bug [17263] which ATM is Resolved/WontFix.
Since the CfC to move this spec to CR passed on July 18 (but the CR has
not yet been published), I would appreciate it you would please Raise
On 7/25/12 4:01 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Earlier today, Hixie added ArrayBuffer back to the WebSocket API ED (see
[r1.272]) as requested in bug [17263] which ATM is Resolved/WontFix.
I believe he did this because at least two implementors have publicly
committed to not removing the ability
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 at 19:02, Chaals McCathieNevile wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:26:44 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
(mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com)
wrote:
Marcos would like to publish a Proposed Edited Recommendation [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17263
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
With some people at Mozilla, we've been working on an API similar to Web
Intents in some points but distant enough to be a counter-proposal. We
believe that the API is now in a good enough shape to be officially sent
in those mailing lists and
