Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names

On 22/04/2013 13:12 , James Graham wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Arthur Barstow wrote: The only thing that we ask is that pull requests not be merged by whoever made the request. Is this to prevent the `fox guarding the chicken coop`, so to speak? If a test facilitator submits tests (i.e. makes

Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names

On 22/04/2013 12:44 , Arthur Barstow wrote: The only thing that we ask is that pull requests not be merged by whoever made the request. Is this to prevent the `fox guarding the chicken coop`, so to speak? The way you put it ascribes malice, whereas we operate on the assumption that people ar

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

Oh, sorry... and thank you all for your explanations. :)

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

Ok, the example of console.log () has made ​​me realize something I had never seen that. In short, if I understood from my tests, asynchronous instruction is executed at the earliest, after the last statement of the scope in which it is declared. There was a misconception ... in my mind. Please

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Alec Flett wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Michaël Rouges > wrote: > >> >> Hum ... thank you for this answer, but ... >> >> Are you sure there is no possibility that the application is completed >> before adding events? >> >> I find it hard to perceive

RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"

Web Applications Working Group, Greetings. In addition to facilitating interprocess communication, clipboarding, with the data of arbitrary selections of hypertext and MathML, the aforementioned techniques can facilitate interprocess communication with the data of arbitrary selections of hype

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Joshua Bell wrote: > >> FWIW, we had a Chrome IDB bug report where someone used the developer >> tools to set a script breakpoint between the open() call and the event >> handler assignments. The debugger spins

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Joshua Bell wrote: > FWIW, we had a Chrome IDB bug report where someone used the developer > tools to set a script breakpoint between the open() call and the event > handler assignments. The debugger spins the event loop, so the event was > dispatched before the h

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

Resending from the correct account: FWIW, we had a Chrome IDB bug report where someone used the developer tools to set a script breakpoint between the open() call and the event handler assignments. The debugger spins the event loop, so the event was dispatched before the handlers were assig

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On 4/22/13 4:36 PM, Joshua Bell wrote: The debugger spins the event loop Fwiw, that seems like a bug in the debugger (albeit a common one in browser debuggers) :( -Boris

Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names

On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Arthur Barstow wrote: The only thing that we ask is that pull requests not be merged by whoever made the request. Is this to prevent the `fox guarding the chicken coop`, so to speak? If a test facilitator submits tests (i.e. makes a PR) and everyone that reviews them s

Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names

On 4/22/13 2:29 PM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: On 19/04/2013 06:15 , Arthur Barstow wrote: Test Facilitators, Editors, All, If you intend to continue to participate in WebApps' testing effort or you intend to begin to participate, please send your GitHub login name to Robin (ro...@w3.org) so he c

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Michaël Rouges wrote: > > Hum ... thank you for this answer, but ... > > Are you sure there is no possibility that the application is completed > before adding events? > > I find it hard to perceive how it couldn't happen. > Just to close the loop on this concern:

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Michaël Rouges wrote: > > Hum ... thank you for this answer, but ... > > Are you sure there is no possibility that the application is completed > before adding events? > > I find it hard to perceive how it couldn't happen. Do you also worry that if you wrote: x =

Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names

On 19/04/2013 06:15 , Arthur Barstow wrote: Test Facilitators, Editors, All, If you intend to continue to participate in WebApps' testing effort or you intend to begin to participate, please send your GitHub login name to Robin (ro...@w3.org) so he can make sure you have appropriate access to We

Re: roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities

sure, that would be great. Let me know when is good. All the best Lisa On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:07:54 +0300 Bryan Sullivan wrote Lisa, If you want to setup an adhoc discussion on your proposal, please let me know and I will join. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan On Ap

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On 4/22/13 1:41 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 4/22/13 1:31 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: Is there a reason to not pass the success/error/upgradeneeded callbacks in a dictionary to open() in this case, so that the request object is born with the

Re: roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities

Lisa, If you want to setup an adhoc discussion on your proposal, please let me know and I will join. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan On Apr 22, 2013 9:42 AM, "Charles McCathie Nevile" wrote: > Hi Lisa, > > On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:52:38 +0300, lisa.seeman > wrote: > > Over the weekend I put up a (very)

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 4/22/13 1:31 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> Is there a reason to not pass the success/error/upgradeneeded callbacks >>> in a >>> dictionary to open() in this case, so that the request object is born >>> with >>> the right bits and the actu

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On 4/22/13 1:31 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: Is there a reason to not pass the success/error/upgradeneeded callbacks in a dictionary to open() in this case, so that the request object is born with the right bits and the actual reques it not kicked off until _after_ the side-effects of getting them o

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 4/22/13 12:47 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> As long as you don't spin the event loop > > That's tricky. Here's some simple code at global scope: > > > request = indexedDB.open('database'); > request.onsuccess = function () {}; > > Can tha

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

Sorry, I usually speak french and my english is quite experimental. The example I gave, with SetTimeout() is useless, if not illustrate that the interpreter does not expect that the events are attached to execute the query. My surprise comes from the comparison with the XMLHttpRequest object, whi

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On 4/22/13 12:47 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: As long as you don't spin the event loop That's tricky. Here's some simple code at global scope: request = indexedDB.open('database'); request.onsuccess = function () {}; Can that code spin the event loop between the open() call and the onsuccess s

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Michaël Rouges wrote: > Hum ... thank you for this answer, but ... > > Are you sure there is no possibility that the application is completed > before adding events? > > I find it hard to perceive how it couldn't happen. I don't quite understand what you're asking

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

Hum ... thank you for this answer, but ... Are you sure there is no possibility that the application is completed before adding events? I find it hard to perceive how it couldn't happen.

Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Michaël Rouges wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm surprised by how events are added to IndexedDB objects. > > For example, base, opening a database: > > var request; > request = indexedDB.open('database'); > request.onsuccess = function () {}; > request.onupgradeneed

InedxedDB events : misconception?

Hello everyone, I'm surprised by how events are added to IndexedDB objects. For example, base, opening a database: var request; request = indexedDB.open('database'); request.onsuccess = function () {}; request.onupgradeneeded = function () {}; request.onerror = function () {}; As you can see, t

Re: roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities

Hi Lisa, On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:52:38 +0300, lisa.seeman wrote: Over the weekend I put up a (very) draft outline for a roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities. See http://athenatechnologies.org/RoadmapCog01.html. The most relivent part is probebly the specification

Re: For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)

Thank you to you for your answers. I watched your codes and, in my opinion, this kind of operation is much heavier than it should. Plus there are any files on the system, the operation will require more treatments. My idea would have the advantage of dividing the system into smaller sections (on

Re: For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)

Hi Michaël, I also implemented a filesystem solution on top of IDB: https://github.com/ebidel/idb.filesystem.js/blob/master/src/idb.filesystem.js It's a polyfill for the W3C Filesystem API [1]. The abstraction is nice because it takes away the hairy details (as you've encountered) of trying to us

RE: For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)

It’s an interesting problem that you’re trying to solve and I’ve had a crack at my own implementation which you can find here - https://github.com/aaronpowell/indexeddb-filesystem A few implementation points: - I don’t think you want to split across multiple objectStores in your datab

For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)

Hello, I recently experimented with this API trying to simulate a file system, but I am sad to see a lack of depth. To preserve the environment applications using my tool, I want to create only one database for my filesystem. So I create my database, I add a table representing a folder and I sav