tly.
>>>
>>> Now we are three co-chairs, we will work between us to fill Art's shoes.
>>> It won't be easy.
>>>
>>> Thanks Art for everything you've done for the group for so long.
>>>
>>> Good luck, and I hope to see you around.
>>>
>>> Chaals
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Jungkee Song
://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/
--
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
tions?
Thanks,
Jungkee
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#maturity-levels>
> [2] <http://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#wide-review>
>
>
--
Jungkee Song
, not the other editors. Domenic's suggestion sound
reasonable to me if we are not coming up with a better plan.
Best regards,
Jungkee
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 8:37 PM
To: Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen; Jungkee
Thanks for comments. I'll address them in the ED.
I didn't get through them all yet, but
* in parallel isn't defined, but it sounds like you mean in parallel to the
main sequence not in parallel to themselves, I'd strongly encourage a
definition.
in parallel is defined here:
On Jul 12, 2014 2:11 AM, Jake Archibald jaffathec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 July 2014 17:59, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Jake Archibald jaffathec...@gmail.com
wrote:
navigator.serviceWorker.ready.then(function(reg) {
reg.push.register(...)
});
On May 9, 2014 12:19 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
IDL arrays are not really supported by any UA, and it's not clear to me
that any plan to do it. The trend has been toward using ES arrays instead
(which typically means IDL sequences).
At first glance, every use of IDL arrays in
On May 9, 2014 1:16 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
In particular, given that get() wants to return a Promise, why do we want
values() to return a list of Cache objects synchronously?
Similar for keys(): if has() needs to be async, then how can has() be
sync.
Exactly. both values()
/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
--
Jungkee Song
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Jungkee Song wrote:
I presume the author originally put the part rather informatively. I
made it a single sentence as clarified here:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/xhr-1/Overview.html
On Feb 17, 2014 8:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2014, at 2:16 AM, Marcos Caceres mar...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Sunday, February 16, 2014, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
tl;dr: I
.
-Thanks, AB
--
Jungkee Song
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
On 2/17/14 6:47 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
On Feb 17, 2014 8:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com mailto:
m...@apple.com wrote:
I personally would like to see it become an official draft of the Working
Group
Thanks Art. The work is attributed to Anne, Chaals and Ms2ger. Thanks!
On Feb 12, 2014 9:28 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Congratulations to Anne, Jungkee and Chaals on the publication of a
Progress Events Recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/
On Feb 3, 2014 11:41 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux d...@w3.org wrote:
Hi,
The TR draft says that the URL of the editors draft is:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/xhr-1/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
I believe it is meant to be:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/xhr-1/Overview.html
That's
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
On 1/23/14 8:48 PM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
I understand your concern. Indeed, we editors should have made it clearer
providing updates on the status and more importantly a new TR.
The goal of the snapshot version
CFCs for ordinary working drafts? Unless I'm not getting something, they
seem to add an unnecessary delay to getting stuff published.
Kind regards,
Marcos
--
Marcos Caceres
On Monday, January 27, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jungkee Song wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Arthur Barstow
On Jan 24, 2014 7:48 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
I don't recall any discussions about stopping the current work,
although
I think it would be
Hi,
I've prepared the PR-ready version of the Progress Events spec:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/progress/raw-file/tip/TR/Overview.html
Please use this version to review and give further comments during the CfC
period, if any.
Jungkee
-Original Message-
From: Jungkee Song
://dvcs.w3.org/hg/progress/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
--
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
-Original Message-
From: Jungkee Song [mailto:jungkee.s...@samsung.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:48 PM
As planned, we editors prepared XMLHttpRequest Level 1 [1] as a
Recommendation track version. Initially, we'd planned to put together a
draft with only the parts
://fetch.spec.whatwg.org
--
Jungkee Song
#infrastructure-for-the-send()-method
[3] http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#infrastructure-for-the-send()-method
[4] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/window.stop
[5]
https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/241#issuecomment-22750928
--
Jungkee Song
UI for XHR traffic).
By that logic I think having it classified as an 'error' event is better,
but IMO this is a minor detail and not really worth our time..
-Hallvord
--
Jungkee Song
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 7:20 AM
On 6/27/13 1:05 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
Hi,
I updated the Interop status of Progress Events:
http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ProgressEvents
Based on your
not tested the WebKit nightly build yet. It would be appreciated
if someone shares the result.
To Microsoft team,
Do you have any dev update in IE10 which brings any changes in the test
result?
Thanks and regards,
Jungkee
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
implementations show:
- Firefox fires.
- Chrome and Opera do not.
Jungkee
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
I just noticed that the topic has been discussed in another thread early
this week. Sorry for rushing around after all that. BTW, what was the
conclusion?
-Original Message-
From: Jungkee Song [mailto:jungkee.s...@samsung.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:33 PM
To: hallv
-Original Message-
From: Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen [mailto:hallv...@opera.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 7:02 PM
The conclusion is this commit:
https://github.com/whatwg/xhr/commit/972797fb12106ca00292b9a2e2cb91d8766c4
640
The ED has been updated with the change:
Hi,
I just updated ED with WHATWG changes:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
We are now mostly in sync with the WHATWG version. Here's the changelog:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/log
Please reply if you find any issues with the applied changes.
Jungkee
Jungkee Song
Samsung
[HTMLWG-Agenda]).
-Regards, Art and Chaals
[Agenda]
[HTMLWG-Agenda]
http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/**wg/2013-04-Agendahttp://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2013-04-Agenda
--
Jungkee Song
From: Timmy Willison [mailto:timmywill...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 2:55 AM
On Feb 24, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
Currently the XMLHttpRequest Standard special
+1
Regards,
Jungkee
2013. 1. 23. 오후 9:38에 Nilsson, Claes1 claes1.nils...@sonymobile.com님이
작성:
+1
** **
*From:* frederick.hir...@nokia.com [mailto:frederick.hir...@nokia.com]
*Sent:* den 22 januari 2013 21:14
*To:* freda...@live.com
*Cc:* frederick.hir...@nokia.com; public-...@w3.org;
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
--
-
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
2013. 1. 20. 오전 12:39에 Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com님이 작성:
On 1/19/13 10:20 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
I've pushed the php file in
http://dvcs.w3.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Samsung/resources/
but cannot find it at w3-test.org mirror. Can anyone help?
Did you do
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:07 AM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote:
Sure there is if the W3C version is stale, as is the case here.
I don't think it's a technical issue to discuss. There should be
corresponding publication rules.
Art, Charles, Doug,
Can you help clarifying which links we
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:46 PM
On 11/26/12 1:38 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
I suggest we put the following wordings for Anne's work and WHATWG to be
credited. If we make consensus, let me use this content for publishing the
WD
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:05 AM
I think the next step is for the XHR Editors to create a TR version
using the WD template so that everyone can see exactly what is being
proposed for publication as a TR. Please create that version
Hi,
I suggest we put the following wordings for Anne's work and WHATWG to be
credited. If we make consensus, let me use this content for publishing the WD.
As the co-Editors of W3C XHR spec wrote in the threads, we have our role and
contribution in moving this spec toward the W3C REC. Up to
on satisfying the
exit criteria to ship it. Please see inline comments and questions.
Jungkee
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:51 PM
On 11/15/12 3:11 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
Hi Art, Charles and Anne,
At this stage
: Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:51 PM
On 11/15/12 3:11 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
Hi Art, Charles and Anne,
At this stage, it will be of great help if you give me some comments on
any issues, concerns, expected actions, etc.
Since the spec is already a CR (with exit criteria
http
contains
annotation for test coverage now.
[1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
Jungkee
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
-Original Message-
From: Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen [mailto:hallv...@opera.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:50 PM
The point is that a browser can act as if every single server response
included Vary: User-Agent. And perhaps should. Intermediary caches
-Original Message-
From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:09 AM
On 10/16/12 1:04 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
That would be an improvement, but wouldn't solve the problem of
intermediary cache poisoning.
Ah, yes. Intermediary caches are
-Original Message-
From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu]
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 12:49 AM
On 10/13/12 5:08 AM, Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote:
I came across an article [1] that describes some of the reasoning for
Flash's change in security policy when it banned setting
-Original Message-
From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 9:50 PM
On 10/15/12 7:18 AM, Jungkee Song wrote:
but if certain backend intends to provide its content under some browser
requirements, isn't Vary: User-Agent sort of a required header
-Original Message-
From: Hallvord R. M. Steen [mailto:hallv...@opera.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:34 AM
To: Julian Aubourg; annevankeste...@gmail.com
Cc: Anne van Kesteren; Jungkee Song; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent
Thanks for the comment, Boris!
Jungkee
-Original Message-
From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 3:26 PM
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [WEBIDL] nullable dictionary members
On 8/15/12 10:05 PM, Jungkee Song wrote:
Having said
dictionary members are required while
others are not.
Regards,
Jungkee
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
flattened member types.
-8-
It does not allow nullable here.
From the mail history I looked up, the intention is to not allow nullable
dictionary type any more. It that right?
Regards,
Jungkee
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
);
// or
reader.readAsText(blob);
// or
reader.readAsArrayBuffer(blob);
}
Regards,
Jungkee
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
FileAPI and XHR. I've copied Anne, Arun, and Jonas - any thought?
In either case, I'm happy to provide the content.
Having hammered out a consensus, I would like to contribute to providing the
content.
Jungkee
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
Hi Glenn and all,
From: Glenn Maynard [mailto:gl...@zewt.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 12:45 AM
To: Robin Berjon
Cc: WebApps WG; Jungkee Song
Subject: Re: Lazy Blob
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
var bb = new BlobBuilder()
, blob
53 matches
Mail list logo
