Art wrote:
All - given that addressing 12111 is a low priority for Ian, one way
forward is for someone else to create a concrete proposal.
Here is a concrete proposal:
http://www.w3.org/2011/06/Web%20Storage.html
Philippe
That text requires the storage mutex, which has not and will not be
implemented by any vendors, let alone 2 interoperable implementations, so it
seems rather doomed.
- James
On Jun 16, 2011 8:58 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote:
Art wrote:
All - given that addressing 12111 is a low
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:59 -0700, James Robinson wrote:
That text requires the storage mutex, which has not and will not be
implemented by any vendors, let alone 2 interoperable implementations,
so it seems rather doomed.
Where does it do that? My only intent was to fix 12111 and nothing
All - given that addressing 12111 is a low priority for Ian, one way
forward is for someone else to create a concrete proposal.
BTW, I don't think anyone from Opera or Safari has commented on bug
12111 and if that is the case, it would be good to get their comments.
-AB
On Jun/14/2011
On Jun/11/2011 3:57 PM, ext James Robinson wrote:
In my opinion, the only thing left to be done with localStorage is to
write it off as an unfortunate failure, learn our lesson, and move on.
This may not be relevant to the processes you are trying to follow.
Stopping work on Web Storage is
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The particular issue in question isn't a particularly important one. The
spec describes a superset of implementations, and is a logical direction
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The particular issue in question isn't a particularly important one. The
spec describes a superset of implementations, and is a logical direction
for the spec to go. (Even within the process, there's no reason we
couldn't go to
On Jun/10/2011 3:05 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
My take on the comments is that most commentors prefer the spec to be
changed as PLH suggested in comment #5:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111#c5
Hixie - are you willing
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On Jun/10/2011 3:05 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
My take on the comments is that most commentors prefer the spec to be
changed as PLH suggested in comment #5:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
On Jun/10/2011 3:05 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
My take on the comments is that most commentors prefer the spec to be
changed as PLH suggested in comment #5:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On Jun/10/2011 3:05 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
My take on the comments is that most commentors prefer the spec to be
changed as PLH suggested in comment #5:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, James Robinson wrote:
I am speaking only for myself (and not Google, WebKit, or Chromium) but
I feel obligated to point out that localStorage specifies a
fundamentally broken synchronization model that we are not able to fix
due to compatibility concerns. This is
My take on the comments is that most commentors prefer the spec to be
changed as PLH suggested in comment #5:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111#c5
Hixie - are you willing to change the spec accordingly?
-AB
On Jun/8/2011 7:57 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
There are now 11
There are now 11 comments on Web Storage Bug 12111, the last remaining
bug before moving this spec back to Last Call:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
If anyone has additional comments, please add them to the bug before the
end of this week.
I would like to get
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
Summary: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not
match implementation behavior
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
15 matches
Mail list logo
