On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:21:09 +0200, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.comwrote:
The reason for using it was in part that there were people there who
were
working on dom and not on the (quite high traffic) webapps list
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.comwrote:
The reason for using it was in part that there were people there who were
working on dom and not on the (quite high traffic) webapps list which
discusses many other things.
LKML is a high-traffic list. Maybe
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:35:58 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net
wrote:
* Ojan Vafai wrote:
This confusion seems to come up a lot since DOM is part of
public-webapps
but uses a separate mailing list. Maybe it's time to reconsider that
decision? It's the editors of the specs who have
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
I wouldn’t mind. I’m on both lists anyway. Schepers originally saw it as a
way of scoping DOM3 Events discussions away from the noise on
public-webapps. I’m not sure that’s a real big concern anymore.
I don't
* Ojan Vafai wrote:
This confusion seems to come up a lot since DOM is part of public-webapps
but uses a separate mailing list. Maybe it's time to reconsider that
decision? It's the editors of the specs who have the largest say here IMO.
The confusion is not going to go away by changing the
of
the version in w3.org/TR/)
-Thanks, AB
Original Message
Subject:[DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
Resent-Date:Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:01:51 +
Resent-From:public-webapps@w3.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:39:36 -0700
From: ext Elliott
Okay, I'll use that one. Both the editors draft and the referenced one are
same in this respect though.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
Elliott, All - please use the www-...@w3.org list for DOM4 discussions
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 6/11/12 7:39 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
After discussing this with some other contributors there were questions
on why we're enforcing the order of the document child nodes.
Because otherwise serialization of the
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 6/11/12 7:39 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
After discussing this with some other contributors there were questions
on why we're enforcing the
Subject:[DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document
children
Resent-Date:Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:01:51 +
Resent-From:public-webapps@w3.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:39:36 -0700
From: ext Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com
To: public-webapps@w3.org
I'm working
, 2012 11:10 AM
To: Arthur Barstow
Cc: espr...@gmail.com; www-dom; public-webapps
Subject: www-dom vs public-webapps WAS: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order
on document children
This confusion seems to come up a lot since DOM is part of public-webapps but
uses a separate mailing list. Maybe
I'm working on places where Webkit doesn't follow the DOM4 mutation
algorithm and one of the bugs is not throwing an exception when a doctype
node is inserted after an element in a document (or other permutations of
the same situation).
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88682
On 6/11/12 7:39 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
After discussing this with some other contributors there were questions
on why we're enforcing the order of the document child nodes.
Because otherwise serialization of the result would be ... very broken?
Can we leave the behavior when your document
13 matches
Mail list logo
