On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:46:00 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, "Chaals McCathieNevile" On
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow (mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com)> wrote:
> > Based on this discussion, I concl
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
> On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, "Chaals McCathieNevile" (mailto:w...@chaals.com)> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow > (mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com)> wrote:
> >
> > > Chaals, Marcos,
> > >
> > > Based on
On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, "Chaals McCathieNevile" wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow
> wrote:
>
>> Chaals, Marcos,
>>
>> Based on this discussion, I concluded this CfC has failed to show we have
>> consensus. As such, after you two have agreed on a version of the spe
On 9 Aug 2012, at 12:52, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Chaals, Marcos,
>
> Based on this discussion, I concluded this CfC has failed to show we have
> consensus. As such, after you two have agreed on a version of the spec that
> satisfies all of Chaals' concerns, my recommendation is we start a ne
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
Chaals, Marcos,
Based on this discussion, I concluded this CfC has failed to show we
have consensus. As such, after you two have agreed on a version of the
spec that satisfies all of Chaals' concerns, my recommendation is we
sta
Chaals, Marcos,
Based on this discussion, I concluded this CfC has failed to show we
have consensus. As such, after you two have agreed on a version of the
spec that satisfies all of Chaals' concerns, my recommendation is we
start a new CfC.
-Thanks, AB
On 7/26/12 9:52 AM, ext Chaals McCath
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:17:42 +0200, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 at 19:02, Chaals McCathieNevile wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:26:44 +0200, Arthur Barstow
mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com)>
wrote:
> Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommendation" [PER]
> o
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 at 19:02, Chaals McCathieNevile wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:26:44 +0200, Arthur Barstow (mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com)>
> wrote:
>
> > Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommendation" [PER] of
> > the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spe
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:26:44 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommendation" [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the
spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
Currently I object. I would
Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommendation" [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the
spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
The [Errata] has already been reflected in the [Proposed-PER] (see
[Diff]) and it includes
10 matches
Mail list logo
