On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:56:41 +0200, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org
wrote:
On Monday 2010-05-10 10:27 -0700, Simon Fraser wrote:
It feels to me like the correct solution would be enhance CSS OM
somehow to allow
authors to attach event listeners to CSSMediaRules somehow, so they can
get
On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:47:42 +0200, João Eiras jo...@opera.com wrote:
Should be
addEventListener(mediaChanged, listener, false);
There is already an event model, and it would just require a new event
type.
A generic event is not a good idea in my opinion. The more media features
we add
On Tue, 11 May 2010 08:47:27 +0200, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:47:42 +0200, João Eiras jo...@opera.com wrote:
Should be
addEventListener(mediaChanged, listener, false);
There is already an event model, and it would just require a new event
type.
A
The consensus on the W3C Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with
callbacks [1] mailing list was that instead of adding individual DOM
events for changes to media features, we should instead make it
possible to get notified when a user defined media query has changed.
The idea was making it
On Friday 2010-05-07 15:31 -0300, Luiz Agostini wrote:
The consensus on the W3C Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with
callbacks [1] mailing list was that instead of adding individual DOM
events for changes to media features, we should instead make it
possible to get notified when a user
I wonder if it makes sense to have another method for adding the
listener instead of abusing the already existing matchMedium. For
instance, calling matchMedium is going to evaluate the expression,
which is not really necessary.
Kenneth
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:48 PM, L. David Baron
On May 10, 2010, at 8:48 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Friday 2010-05-07 15:31 -0300, Luiz Agostini wrote:
The consensus on the W3C Extending CSSOM Views matchMedium with
callbacks [1] mailing list was that instead of adding individual DOM
events for changes to media features, we should
Hi Simon,
So what you are suggesting is a kind of
document.addMediaRuleListener(mediaquery, listener) etc? I think that
should be quite easy to implement.
Kenneth
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
On May 10, 2010, at 8:48 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Friday
Ola Joao,
That would mean that the user would have to manually call all
matchMedium queries the user is interested in to find out which one
changed, without us being able to optimize this by not redoing the
parsing of the queries etc.
Att,
Kenneth
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:47 PM, João Eiras
On Monday 2010-05-10 10:27 -0700, Simon Fraser wrote:
This simple callback-based mechanism suffers from various problems (of the
type
that add/removeEventListener were designed to solve):
1. Unclear behavior when calling matchMedium() a second time for the same
query,
with a different
On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:53:52 +0200, Kenneth Christiansen
kenneth.christian...@openbossa.org wrote:
Ola Joao,
That would mean that the user would have to manually call all
matchMedium queries the user is interested in to find out which one
changed, without us being able to optimize this by
Though it will probably become more used due to the media features,
such as (orientation:...), (view-mode:...) etc. especially on mobile
devices.
Anyway, I agree that it is not a bottleneck for the time being.
Kenneth
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:11 PM, João Eiras jo...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon,
All - FYI, I think the next steps here are to hash out some process
related issues so I started a related discussion on the public-
hypertext-cg mail list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hypertext-cg/2010AprJun/
0001.html
-Art Barstow
On Apr 12, 2010, at 4:12 PM, ext Marcos
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:39:47 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
All - FYI, I think the next steps here are to hash out some process
related issues so I started a related discussion on the public-
hypertext-cg mail list:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 2:25 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:44 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
4. all these queries could/should have an
On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 2:25 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:44 AM, Marcos
16 matches
Mail list logo
