On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
What are your use-cases where they're not the same? More importantly, what
are the use-cases where they cannot be made the same by the developer?
E.g. embedding a widget for video or audio manipulation. The widget
On 2013-09-03 01:29, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
What are your use-cases where they're not the same? More importantly,
what are the use-cases where they cannot be made the same by the developer?
E.g. the main page delegating communication to someone else (perhaps via
an iFrame). If the
On 09/03/2013 10:27 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
On 2013-09-03 01:29, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
What are your use-cases where they're not the same? More importantly,
what are the use-cases where they cannot be made the same by the developer?
E.g. the main page delegating communication to
On 2013-09-03 12:01, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
On 09/03/2013 10:27 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
On 2013-09-03 01:29, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
What are your use-cases where they're not the same? More importantly,
what are the use-cases where they cannot be made the same by the developer?
E.g.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK
stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com wrote:
I think it should stop playing since the object srcObject references is
gone. (It would work differently with createObjecURL + myVideoTag.src
since that would only be a handle to an underlying resource)
On 2013-09-03 14:02, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK
stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com wrote:
I think it should stop playing since the object srcObject references is
gone. (It would work differently with createObjecURL + myVideoTag.src
since that
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
What are your use-cases where they're not the same? More importantly,
what
are the use-cases where they cannot be made the same by the
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
The widget would not only have to be written by a third party, but actually
hosted on their domain. And not just optionally, but for some reason the
widget provider has decided not to allow the author to host it on
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
The widget would not only have to be written by a third party, but
actually
hosted on their domain. And not just optionally, but for some
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
Yes. For example there are plans to enable some kind of private mode for
WebRTC MediaStreams that protects stream contents from inspection by the
page. I don't know exactly how this is going to work, but if we allow
On 2013-09-02 01:44, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com
mailto:stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com wrote:
One need I can see is when you want to display the video in another
window. Let's say you want to have
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK
stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com wrote:
On 2013-09-02 01:44, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com
mailto:stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com wrote:
One need
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com wrote:
One need I can see is when you want to display the video in another
window. Let's say you want to have the video in a popout window -
something I think we should definitely support - handing that
On 2013-08-28 17:48, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
Hi WebApps WG,
The Media Capture Task Force (responsible for specs that deal with
MediaStream objects [1]) has been considering whether one should be able
to assign a MediaStream to video and audio elements via an URL
obtained via
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
I can't think of any good reason to support createObjectURL(MediaStream) ---
except for compatibility with existing content, which may be an issue
already.
As I understand it, we have the createObjectURL() design
On Aug 28, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
Hi WebApps WG,
The Media Capture Task Force (responsible for specs that deal with
MediaStream objects [1]) has been considering whether one should be able
to assign a MediaStream to video and audio elements via an URL
obtained
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux d...@w3.orgwrote:
We are thus looking for input on the use cases for createObjectURL as
used for the File API, and whether these use cases would also apply to
our MediaStream case. In general, is there a need for any object
readable
17 matches
Mail list logo
