On 9/9/11 6:27 AM, ext Olli Pettay wrote:
On 09/07/2011 05:09 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Arthur
Barstow wrote:
Some members of the group consider the D3E spec as the highest
priority of
our DOM-related specs and they have put considerable resources into
that
spec
On 09/07/2011 05:09 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Some members of the group consider the D3E spec as the highest priority of
our DOM-related specs and they have put considerable resources into that
spec. Doug and Jacob will continue to lead that s
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Some members of the group consider the D3E spec as the highest priority of
> our DOM-related specs and they have put considerable resources into that
> spec. Doug and Jacob will continue to lead that spec effort, and as I
> understand it, a C
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 9/5/11 3:34 PM, ext Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>
>> We should make these kinds of
>> decisions *solely* on technical grounds.
>
> Well surely making decisions on technical grounds is important. However, it
> seems a bit simplistic to consider
On 9/5/11 3:34 PM, ext Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
We should make these kinds of
decisions *solely* on technical grounds.
Well surely making decisions on technical grounds is important. However,
it seems a bit simplistic to consider it the only factor. (I seem to
recall some previous decisions were
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Arthur Barstow
> wrote:
> >
> > Some members of the group consider the D3E spec as the highest
> > priority of our DOM-related specs and they have put considerable
> > resources into that spec. Doug and Jacob will conti
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for the comments and discussion! I finally reviewed all of the
> responses and here are my thoughts on moving forward ...
>
> Some members of the group consider the D3E spec as the highest priority of
> our DOM-related spec
Hi All,
Thanks for the comments and discussion! I finally reviewed all of the
responses and here are my thoughts on moving forward ...
Some members of the group consider the D3E spec as the highest priority
of our DOM-related specs and they have put considerable resources into
that spec. Dou
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:52:34 +0200, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Is this explicitly mentioned in the spec? Otherwise how will anyone be
>> able to take advantage of this fact?
>
> I guess we could explicitly mention it somewhere. On the o
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:52:34 +0200, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Is this explicitly mentioned in the spec? Otherwise how will anyone be
able to take advantage of this fact?
I guess we could explicitly mention it somewhere. On the other hand,
everything has references and back-references and so far i
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> I think defining all of these in one specification is fine. Currently the
> specification is only 37 pages when printed. That will certainly grow once
> we add ranges, examples, and more introductory text, but will also still be
> well be
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:28:56 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
Before we publish a new WD of Anne's DOM spec, I would like comments on
how the DOM specs should be organized. In particular: a) whether you
prefer the status quo (currently that is DOM Core plus D3E) or if you
want various addition
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Before we publish a new WD of Anne's DOM spec, I would like comments on how
> the DOM specs should be organized. In particular: a) whether you prefer the
> status quo (currently that is DOM Core plus D3E) or if you want various
> additional
Hi Art,
(CCing some people you apparently forget to CC, but who might have an
opinion on this matter, and a stake in the outcome of the discussion.)
On 08/11/2011 12:28 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[ Topic changed to how to organize the group's DOM specs ... ]
Hi Adrian, Anne, Doug, Jacob, All,
[ Topic changed to how to organize the group's DOM specs ... ]
Hi Adrian, Anne, Doug, Jacob, All,
The WG is chartered to do maintenance on the DOM specs so a question for
us is how to organize the DOM specs, in particular, whether Anne's DOM
spec should be constrained (or not) to some set of f
15 matches
Mail list logo
