Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2

2009-02-10 Thread Robin Berjon
On Feb 10, 2009, at 00:39 , Sean Hogan wrote: There are a few active JS implementation projects: I don't know if there is precedent in counting JS-based implementations as valid implementation to get a spec out the door (maybe the Forms WG did it?) but I see no reason not to. In fact, I

Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2

2009-02-10 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
We're interested in implementing XBL2 in WebKit as well, though I can't give a specific timetable. On Feb 10, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: On Feb 10, 2009, at 15:27 , Boris Zbarsky wrote: Robin Berjon wrote: I don't know if there is precedent in counting JS-based

Seeking implementation status of XBL2

2009-02-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, The W3C's XBL2 Candidate spec [1] was published almost two years ago. Since then, there has been some implementation activity reported (e.g. [2],[3]) but nothing recently. Does anyone have XBL2 implementation status they can share with us? -Regards, Art Barstow [1]

Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2

2009-02-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi All, The W3C's XBL2 Candidate spec [1] was published almost two years ago. Since then, there has been some implementation activity reported (e.g. [2],[3]) but nothing recently. Does anyone have XBL2 implementation status they can share with us? I don't yet have

Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2

2009-02-09 Thread Sean Hogan
There are a few active JS implementation projects: xbl.googlecode.com, see http://code.google.com/p/xbl/wiki/Features dojo.E has some support, see: http://blog.nexaweb.com/post/xbl-support-for-all-browsers-via-dojoe/ XBLUI, see: http://meekostuff.net/projects/XBLUI/status.html XBLUI (my