Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Notifications; deadline October 24

On Thursday, September 12, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > WebApps - the Web Notification WG asked WebApps to review their > September 12 LCWD of Web Notifications: > > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-notifications-20130912/> > > Individual WG members a

Plan to transition Web Notifications spec to LCWD

Today, the Web Notifications WG[1] has published a Last Call Working Draft of the Web Notifications specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-notifications-20130912/ We're targeting October 24 as the end date for the LC review period. During the review period, the Web Notifications WG

RfC: LCWD of Web Notifications; deadline October 24

WebApps - the Web Notification WG asked WebApps to review their September 12 LCWD of Web Notifications: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-notifications-20130912/> Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback. If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official WG re

Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)

On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:07:27 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: In the default case yes. Can you use something to change that (a la from-origin)? I don't really see how. Do you have an example where it makes sense? Probably by

Re: Web Notifications

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Andrew Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Olli Pettay wrote: >> On 06/20/2012 11:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to

Re: Web Notifications

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Olli Pettay wrote: > On 06/20/2012 11:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to W3C >> Last Call meaning we don't intend to change it. But we might have &

Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:25 PM, John Gregg wrote: > Can we either go back to the original language where in the showing > algorithm you compare both tag and origin (add origin to the model), Sure. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/notifications/rev/93c6983ce465 -- Anne — Opera Software http://annevankes

Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Olli Pettay > wrote: > > Seems like tags are global. I think they should be per origin. > > Yes I believe they should be. > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/notifications/rev/563e9af218b9 > > Thanks, > This see

Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > In the default case yes. Can you use something to change that (a la > from-origin)? I don't really see how. Do you have an example where it makes sense? -- Anne — Opera Software http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)

On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:30:08 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Olli Pettay wrote: Seems like tags are global. I think they should be per origin. Yes I believe they should be. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/notifications/rev/563e9af218b9 In the default case yes.

Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Olli Pettay wrote: > Seems like tags are global. I think they should be per origin. Yes I believe they should be. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/notifications/rev/563e9af218b9 Thanks, -- Anne — Opera Software http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Web Notifications

On 06/20/2012 11:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Hi, The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to W3C Last Call meaning we don't intend to change it. But we might have missed something and would therefore appreciate your review of http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/notification

Re: Web Notifications

On 20 June 2012 10:58, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Hi, > > The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to W3C > Last Call meaning we don't intend to change it. But we might have > missed something and would therefore appreciate your review of >

Web Notifications

Hi, The Web Notifications WG is planning to move Web Notifications to W3C Last Call meaning we don't intend to change it. But we might have missed something and would therefore appreciate your review of http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/notifications/raw-file/tip/Overview.html and any comments you might

Web Notifications: please use public-web-notification [Was: Interacting with notifications]

Please use the public-web-notification list for the Web Notifications spec. John - I think it would be helpful if you would include a note about public-web-notification in the Status of Document section. -ArtB Original Message Subject:Interacting with

Web Notifications: public-web-notification created

The public-web-notification Mail List was created for the Web Notifications spec and the ML's archive is available at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-notification/ The above includes a "subscribe to this list" link. Original Message Subjec

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

agree that the scope matches our charter, would there be any objection (from Google, from WebApps) in taking up that work in the Device APIs and Policy Working Group rather than WebApps? I added Web Notifications to the Agenda Items list for WebApps' API meeting at TPAC: [[ http://www.w3.o

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > (adding the Device APIs Working Group mailing list in CC:) > > Hi John, Web Apps > > Le lundi 19 octobre 2009 à 14:12 -0700, John Gregg a écrit : > > Apologies for the delay, I've been spending the majority of my time > > completi

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

(adding the Device APIs Working Group mailing list in CC:) Hi John, Web Apps Le lundi 19 octobre 2009 à 14:12 -0700, John Gregg a écrit : > Apologies for the delay, I've been spending the majority of my time > completing the initial implementation for Chrome, but I've posted a > draft version of

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

Apologies for the delay, I've been spending the majority of my time completing the initial implementation for Chrome, but I've posted a draft version of a spec for notifications to http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-documents/desktop-notifications/api-specification I thin

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

Hi Marcos, I'm doing the implementation for Chromium so I'm pretty familiar with notifications. Although I'm fairly new to the process, I would be happy to volunteer to help, since I would definitely like to see a new notifications spec come together. -John On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Marc

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

John Gregg wrote: > Hi Marcos, > > I'm doing the implementation for Chromium so I'm pretty familiar with > notifications. Although I'm fairly new to the process, I would be happy > to volunteer to help, since I would definitely like to see a new > notifications spec come together. Great! Bas

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: We are in the middle of implementing in WebKit and in Chromium, so yes we are still interested in pursuing. John Gregg (johnnyg@) has been leading the effort from our end. Beyond an implementation that people can experiment with, what sort of resources are you looki

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

We are in the middle of implementing in WebKit and in Chromium, so yes we are still interested in pursuing. John Gregg (johnnyg@) has been leading the effort from our end. Beyond an implementation that people can experiment with, what sort of resources are you looking for? 2009/9/4 Marcos Caceres

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

Hi Jeremy, On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > Jeremy Orlow wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Marcos Caceres > > wrote: >> >>    Keeping in line with the design goals to enable Widget-related >>    technologies to be used on the Web,

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Marcos Caceres mailto:marc...@opera.com>> wrote: Keeping in line with the design goals to enable Widget-related technologies to be used on the Web, I'm wondering if we should spawn a separate specification for notifications? We c

Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Keeping in line with the design goals to enable Widget-related technologies > to be used on the Web, I'm wondering if we should spawn a separate > specification for notifications? We could use the current text in the A&E > [1] as the basis,

Web Notifications, do we need a new spec?

Keeping in line with the design goals to enable Widget-related technologies to be used on the Web, I'm wondering if we should spawn a separate specification for notifications? We could use the current text in the A&E [1] as the basis, which is based heavily on what was originally in HTML5 (or j