Re: [Pulp-dev] [Breaking] Stopping the installer from auto-creating migrations - Sept 3rd

2019-09-03 Thread David Davis
The step to create migrations has been removed from the installer: https://github.com/pulp/ansible-pulp/pull/144 David On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:31 PM Mike DePaulo wrote: > Yes, just create a pulpcore PR that removes the makemigrations line, as > well as the line above it. > (Honestly, commen

Re: [Pulp-dev] status of the ansible postgres role

2019-09-03 Thread Brian Bouterse
I'm also in favor of doing option 1 until option 2 is possible. I had an existing email thread with the upstream maintainer going. To work towards option (2) I've bumped that thread with him just now, identifying the PRs below and asking him to review+feedback or review+merge. https://github.com/

[Pulp-dev] Pulp 2.21.0 schedule

2019-09-03 Thread Daniel Alley
A 2.21.0 release is being planned with some features and recent fixes. Here [0] is a release schedule page which outlines some tentative dates, starting with a dev freeze on September 11th, 2019 @ 22:00 UTC. The full list of features and bug fixes to be released can be found here [1]. [0] https:/

Re: [Pulp-dev] Pulpcore RC5 Release Planning

2019-09-03 Thread Ina Panova
Thank for clarification, then there is no need for an extra rc release. Regards, Ina Panova Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:08 PM David Davis wrote: > T

Re: [Pulp-dev] Pulpcore RC5 Release Planning

2019-09-03 Thread David Davis
The only core change in 4681 is that it raises an exception when there is no default_related_name defined on a Detail model. So no plugin release should be blocked by 4681. David On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:00 AM Ina Panova wrote: > Brian, > > how about releasing RC5 earlier, for example Thursda

Re: [Pulp-dev] Pulpcore RC5 Release Planning

2019-09-03 Thread Ina Panova
Brian, how about releasing RC5 earlier, for example Thursday Sep 5, and putting the blocker list to RC6? With the recent changes happened in core [0], plugins cannot release unless there is already a released core version that contains this change. For example, docker plugin would like to cut anot

Re: [Pulp-dev] status of the ansible postgres role

2019-09-03 Thread Dennis Kliban
Combination of 1 and 2: we need to find a way to collaborate with the author more closely to get outstanding PRs merged. On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:28 AM Matthias Dellweg wrote: > Hi all, > in the ansible-pulp role (that is meant to install pulp) we use a role > to install the postgresql db-server

[Pulp-dev] status of the ansible postgres role

2019-09-03 Thread Matthias Dellweg
Hi all, in the ansible-pulp role (that is meant to install pulp) we use a role to install the postgresql db-server from galaxy named ansible-role-postgres. Sadly the upstream version of this role is missing fedora30 support, and the PR for this has not been merged for a long time. This leads to ans