https://github.com/pulp/pulp-ci/pull/557 was also part of this effort.
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> https://github.com/pulp/pulp-ci/pull/556 does this, correct?
>
I thought it did, but it was incomplete. Also needed
https://github.com/pulp/pulp-ci/pull/558
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
+1 to that. It's also blocking this PR's merge:
https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1134
How do we remove F26 from the testing matrix?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Dennis Kliban wrote:
> We should remove F26 from the testing matrix. This will leave us with F27
> and EL7 until we start
We should remove F26 from the testing matrix. This will leave us with F27
and EL7 until we start building F28 packages.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote:
> Folks,
>
> It seems to me the F26 CI is still broken: https://paste.fedoraproject.
> org/paste/RVrMq9GoBbiFfbqHVm03mA
Folks,
It seems to me the F26 CI is still broken:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/RVrMq9GoBbiFfbqHVm03mA
https://pulpadmin.fedorapeople.org/jenkins/jobs/unittest-pulp_rpm-pr/builds/1155/node-type=f26-np.txt
But do we need F26? It's been unmaintained IIRC for about a month already.
--
milan
I agree we should carry the dependency until it’s released. The RHEL7
breakage is blocking QE currently so let’s revert the change[0] while
@milan and I can work on getting a PR open to pulp-packaging to get the
dependency into our repos.
[0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/46
David
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Kovacik wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We've merged a package dependency requirement update[1] to make it possible
> for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable[2].
>
> This has broken the EL7 builds
So, often times we have needs to carry new/updated
Folks,
We've merged a package dependency requirement update[1] to make it possible
for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable[2].
This has broken the RHEL7 builds, which was expected and there's a bug to
track the update of RHEL7 with that regard[3], scheduled for RHEL7.7
Fedora 27&28
