This PUP has been merged. I’ll send out the initial announcement in a new
thread in the next few days. This announcement will include the date when
we plan to enable the 2FA requirement.
Thanks.
David
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:04 AM Jeff Ortel wrote:
> +1
>
> On 08/15/2018 01:10 PM, David Da
+1
On 08/15/2018 01:10 PM, David Davis wrote:
Thanks everyone for the feedback. I have opened a PR for PUP-7 which
(if approved) will require 2FA for the Pulp organization in Github:
https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/14
Feedback welcome. Also, I'd like to call for a vote by August 27,
2018.
There were some questions this morning about how to set up 2FA and use it
with Github. I want to send out this link:
https://help.github.com/articles/securing-your-account-with-two-factor-authentication-2fa/
I’ve added this link to the PUP as well. If you have more questions, feel
free to ask.
D
+1
Regards,
Ina Panova
Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
"Do not go where the path may lead,
go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Brian Bouterse
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>
+1
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> +1
>
> tiny grammar fix on the PR requested. Thank you for organizing this!
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:10 PM, David Davis
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone for the feedback. I have opened a PR for PUP-7 which (if
>> approved) will requi
+1
tiny grammar fix on the PR requested. Thank you for organizing this!
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:10 PM, David Davis wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the feedback. I have opened a PR for PUP-7 which (if
> approved) will require 2FA for the Pulp organization in Github:
>
> https://github.com/pulp/pu
Thanks everyone for the feedback. I have opened a PR for PUP-7 which (if
approved) will require 2FA for the Pulp organization in Github:
https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/14
Feedback welcome. Also, I'd like to call for a vote by August 27, 2018. Per
PUP-1[0], are the voting options:
+1: "Will be
+1 to opening a PUP. Seems like that’s the best way to document the policy.
I will start working on this.
David
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 2:21 PM Brian Bouterse wrote:
> +1 to requiring it. I also already have it enabled. Would it be possible
> to either (a) turn this into a short pup and call f
+1 to requiring it. I also already have it enabled. Would it be possible to
either (a) turn this into a short pup and call for a vote or (b) add a date
to close this email thread decision by?
Let me know if I should help write/review any.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 6:09 AM, Tatiana Tereshchenko
wro
+1, enabled.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:02 AM, Dennis Kliban wrote:
> +1, but I already have it enabled.
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:53 PM, David Davis
> wrote:
>
>> I got a notification from another organization I am a member of on
>> Github[0] that they are going to require Two Factor Authe
+1, but I already have it enabled.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:53 PM, David Davis wrote:
> I got a notification from another organization I am a member of on
> Github[0] that they are going to require Two Factor Authentication[1] in
> response to recent news about some malicious code being shipped
I got a notification from another organization I am a member of on
Github[0] that they are going to require Two Factor Authentication[1] in
response to recent news about some malicious code being shipped in a
compromised npm package[2].
We are vulnerable to having malicious code deployed to PyPI i
12 matches
Mail list logo
