Re: [Pulp-list] dropping el6 builds of Pulp

2016-11-17 Thread Mihai Ibanescu
I would love for all the pulp components to be easily installable via pip install. That will probably require moving a lot of the data-manipulation that is happening in the rpm spec files into setup.py. Also, I am not sure how well pulp would handle the new paths for things like the json file that

[Pulp-list] Pulp 2.10.2 Hotfix now generally available!

2016-11-17 Thread Sean Myers
Pulp 2.10.2 Hotfix is now generally available in the stable repositories: https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp/stable/2.10/ https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp/stable/2/ This is a critical hotfix addressing a issues that resulted in 2.10.1 being rolled back. This release

Re: [Pulp-list] dropping el6 builds of Pulp

2016-11-17 Thread Christina Plummer
> > 1. Make 2.11 the last Pulp release to have el6 packages. All 2.11.z > releases would get el6 support. 2.12 would have el7 and Fedora packages > only. > > 2. Make el6 builds available until the day Django14 gets removed from > epel6. On that day, Pulp on el6 would become unsupported and builds w

Re: [Pulp-list] dropping el6 builds of Pulp

2016-11-17 Thread Joe Adams
Not sure if this is a very redhat way of doing things, but what about converting it over to a pip installation? That would allow it to be installed in a virtual environment and run on any version of the operating system so long as it can compile or install the required components. That would also b

Re: [Pulp-list] dropping el6 builds of Pulp

2016-11-17 Thread Michael Hrivnak
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:32 AM, wrote: > We are currently testing the use of pulp consumer for centralized package > installation across our EL 5/6/7 servers and hope to use it in production > in the near future. > > Will the pulp consumer packages (and deps) be available still for el6 and > eve

Re: [Pulp-list] /var/lib/pulp/content directory structure changed from 2.4.0 to 2.9.1

2016-11-17 Thread Alan Evangelista
Problem solved. I had initially moved rpms/srpms directories to /var/lib/pulp/content/units instead of /var/lib/pulp/content. Putting these directories under /var/lib/pulp/content, restoring the DB and running pulp-manage-db again allowed Pulp to find the rpm packages and migrate them correctly

Re: [Pulp-list] dropping el6 builds of Pulp

2016-11-17 Thread acjohnson
We are currently testing the use of pulp consumer for centralized package installation across our EL 5/6/7 servers and hope to use it in production in the near future. Will the pulp consumer packages (and deps) be available still for el6 and even el5? On 2016-11-17 08:20, Michael Hrivnak wrote:

[Pulp-list] dropping el6 builds of Pulp

2016-11-17 Thread Michael Hrivnak
We need your input on when to stop making builds of Pulp for el6. Running Pulp on el6, which uses Python 2.6, has been getting more difficult over time. Many libraries we depend on have dropped support for Python 2.6, which exacerbates the usual challenge of making dependencies available on an agi