On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 04:51 +0100, Malte Gell wrote:
> Am 16.02.2014 12:24, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
>
> > On the topic of audio/video sync, synchronization requires accurate
> > latency information. PulseAudio doesn't have that information. If the
> > audio lags by a constant amount all the time, t
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:04 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 04:51 +0100, Malte Gell wrote:
> > Am 16.02.2014 12:24, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
> >
> > > On the topic of audio/video sync, synchronization requires accurate
> > > latency information. PulseAudio doesn't have that infor
Hi,
> On 15 feb. 2014, at 08:37, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Here's another (and hopefully final) prerelease for PulseAudio 5.0.
> This one mostly includes some crasher fixes and documentation updates.
Are there chances for the Bluez 5 HSF support through oFono to enter before the
5.0 r
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 12:00 +0100, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> > On 15 feb. 2014, at 08:37, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Here's another (and hopefully final) prerelease for PulseAudio 5.0.
> > This one mostly includes some crasher fixes and documentation updates.
>
> Are there chan
The flag was originally set unconditionally, but it was removed in
298d1a3cf5ac4fbfe9cf793a5eb59162f892, because the flag broke the
use case where a normal source (e.g. a microphone) was used. The flag
makes sense only with monitor sources, which should get suspended when
nothing is playing to
Am 18.02.2014 10:06, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
> I forgot to mention - these messages do not give any hints about why the
> latency is increasing, that is, which buffer is getting bigger.
My guess is, there is a kernel problem, maybe somewhere in ALSA. Because
I get audio dropouts even with ALSA whe
Am 18.02.2014 10:06, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:04 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 04:51 +0100, Malte Gell wrote:
Am 16.02.2014 12:24, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
On the topic of audio/video sync, synchronization requires accurate
latency information. PulseAu
I can confirm that; with module-rtp-recv, I've seen latencies of tens of
seconds.
Laurentiu Nicola
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014, at 13:08, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 18.02.2014 10:06, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
> > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:04 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 04:51 +0100
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 12:08 +0100, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 18.02.2014 10:06, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
> > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:04 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 04:51 +0100, Malte Gell wrote:
> >>> Am 16.02.2014 12:24, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
> >>>
> On the topic of
I've setup Pulseaudio so that I can direct the sound from my laptop to my
media player (Raspberry PI), but there is a problem. For some reason the
pulseaudio on PI starts to "cut" the sound every few minutes. By that I
mean that the playback pauses for a short while several times and then
conti
Hello,
Are you using RTP or the native protocol? I'm having this kind of
difficulties with RTP, but in my case it's caused by the WiFi latency
jitter. While the throughput is clearly enough for audio, my network has
latency spikes high enough to -- I assume -- confuse the clock skew
estimation in
On 17 February 2014 16:16, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 16:06 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> (Resend including list as well)
>> On 17 Feb 2014 09:30, "Arun Raghavan" wrote:
>>
>> > On 16 February 2014 16:33, Tanu Kaskinen
>> > wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > Yes, I can and I will start
On 17 February 2014 23:47, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 12:46 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 16:06 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> > > I'm not completely clear what you're trying to achieve with volume
>> > > control objects right now - are you just trying to f
On 11 February 2014 19:33, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
[...]
> The alternative for separate volume controls is that we keep embedding the
> volume in various other objects, like sinks, sources, ports (which, btw, are
> currently missing volume control altogether when they are inactive), sink
> inputs and
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 21:26 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On 17 February 2014 23:47, Tanu Kaskinen
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 12:46 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 16:06 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> >> > > I'm not completely clear what you're trying to achieve with
On 17 February 2014 23:04, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
[...]
> A sensible model has been demonstrated (as a replacement of the current
> logic) that doesn't fit into those assumptions. E.g. (here I am deliberately
> trying to "misinterpret" and/or augment the earlier e-mails by Tanu, just to
> se
On 18 February 2014 21:41, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 21:26 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> On 17 February 2014 23:47, Tanu Kaskinen
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 12:46 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 16:06 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> >> > > I'm
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 21:39 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On 11 February 2014 19:33, Tanu Kaskinen
> wrote:
> [...]
> > The alternative for separate volume controls is that we keep embedding the
> > volume in various other objects, like sinks, sources, ports (which, btw, are
> > currently missing
18.02.2014 22:12, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 17 February 2014 23:04, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
[...]
A sensible model has been demonstrated (as a replacement of the current
logic) that doesn't fit into those assumptions. E.g. (here I am deliberately
trying to "misinterpret" and/or augment the e
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 21:50 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On 18 February 2014 21:41, Tanu Kaskinen
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 21:26 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> >> On 17 February 2014 23:47, Tanu Kaskinen
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 12:46 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >> >
Am 18.02.2014 13:38, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 12:08 +0100, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 18.02.2014 10:06, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:04 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 04:51 +0100, Malte Gell wrote:
Am 16.02.2014 12:24, schrieb Tanu Kaski
21 matches
Mail list logo
