Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] LFE remixing

2014-11-09 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
06.11.2014 15:50, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 06.11.2014 15:39, David Henningsson wrote: On 2014-09-30 15:59, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 30.09.2014 19:07, David Henningsson wrote: On 2014-09-26 14:17, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: A summary of my proposal: To add LFE low-pass filtering, just

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] LFE remixing

2014-11-06 Thread David Henningsson
On 2014-09-30 15:59, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 30.09.2014 19:07, David Henningsson wrote: On 2014-09-26 14:17, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: A summary of my proposal: To add LFE low-pass filtering, just hack the current remixer implementation, no need for interface changes anywhere. Actually,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] LFE remixing

2014-11-06 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
06.11.2014 15:39, David Henningsson wrote: On 2014-09-30 15:59, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 30.09.2014 19:07, David Henningsson wrote: On 2014-09-26 14:17, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: A summary of my proposal: To add LFE low-pass filtering, just hack the current remixer implementation, no need

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] LFE remixing

2014-09-30 Thread David Henningsson
On 2014-09-26 14:17, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: A summary of my proposal: To add LFE low-pass filtering, just hack the current remixer implementation, no need for interface changes anywhere. Actually, I think this could be good enough, at least as a first step. Do you think it would be okay to:

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] LFE remixing

2014-09-30 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
30.09.2014 19:07, David Henningsson wrote: On 2014-09-26 14:17, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: A summary of my proposal: To add LFE low-pass filtering, just hack the current remixer implementation, no need for interface changes anywhere. Actually, I think this could be good enough, at least as a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] LFE remixing

2014-09-28 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 02:40 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 26.09.2014 18:17, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: A summary of my proposal: To add LFE low-pass filtering, just hack the current remixer implementation, no need for interface changes anywhere. OK. With that phrase, I no longer feel

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] LFE remixing

2014-09-28 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
28.09.2014 17:36, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 02:40 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 26.09.2014 18:17, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: A summary of my proposal: To add LFE low-pass filtering, just hack the current remixer implementation, no need for interface changes anywhere. OK.

[pulseaudio-discuss] LFE remixing

2014-09-26 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
Hi, One of the proposed topics for the miniconf is how to separate the low frequencies for the LFE channel when remixing. When discussing GSoC projects, one of Alexander's proposals was to implement advanced remixing features (beyond just LFE remixing), and at that point I made this

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] LFE remixing

2014-09-26 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
26.09.2014 18:17, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: A summary of my proposal: To add LFE low-pass filtering, just hack the current remixer implementation, no need for interface changes anywhere. OK. With that phrase, I no longer feel that I can interfere with your plans. To make the remixer parameters