On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:19:34PM EST, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Sure they do.
>
> I just downloaded 0.9.15 tarball, then cloned my repo and issued:
>
> git format-patch v0.9.15..origin/0.9.15-branch
>
> Then I applied them in order.
>
> It all works fine. Not sure what you're doing to break it but i
Hi Lennart,
Remember a while back I mentioned something about changing the
pavucontrol UI to make it a little more obvious about changing device
(the current right click/menu thing is non-obvious for people).
I've originally changed the design as you know to use a combo box drop
down with th
'Twas brillig, and Mark Greenwood at 13/06/09 17:48 did gyre and gimble:
On Saturday 13 Jun 2009 16:46:10 Nix wrote:
I take it you're not a KDE user then Lennart... ~/.kde/share/apps/config/ ;)
s/Lennart/Nix/
--
Colin Guthrie
gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie
http://colin.guthr.ie/
Day Job:
T
On 10 Jun 2009, Felipe Contreras stated:
> What do you propose instead? Have a "$version-stable" branch for each
> and every release? That doesn't scale, the repository will be polluted
> with branches that nobody use any more.
Yes, exactly. Branches are (very) cheap.
(In any case, someone might
On Sat, 13.06.09 17:07, Nix (n...@esperi.org.uk) wrote:
>
> On 27 May 2009, Lennart Poettering outgrape:
>
> > On Thu, 28.05.09 04:53, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
> >
> >> I think it is useful that you have the internal api calls so dbus is not
> >> a requirement for co
On Saturday 13 Jun 2009 16:46:10 Nix wrote:
> On 13 May 2009, Jason Taylor spake thusly:
>
> > shouldn't the directory be ~/.config/pulseaudio now ?
> >
> > http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
>
> That's very non-Unixlike. Unix tradition has always been that if
On Sat, 13.06.09 16:46, Nix (n...@esperi.org.uk) wrote:
>
> On 13 May 2009, Jason Taylor spake thusly:
>
> > shouldn't the directory be ~/.config/pulseaudio now ?
> >
> > http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
>
> That's very non-Unixlike. Unix tradition has alwa
On Sat, 13.06.09 17:09, Nix (n...@esperi.org.uk) wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering said:
> > Nothing is future proof. I never made guarantees of API/ABI stability,
> > nor will ever make any.
>
> In that case the likelihood of PA ever becoming a serious
> infrastructural component are ni
On 13 May 2009, Jason Taylor spake thusly:
> shouldn't the directory be ~/.config/pulseaudio now ?
>
> http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
That's very non-Unixlike. Unix tradition has always been that if you
need multiple per-user configuration files, you put th
On 7 Jun 2009, Lennart Poettering said:
> Nothing is future proof. I never made guarantees of API/ABI stability,
> nor will ever make any.
In that case the likelihood of PA ever becoming a serious
infrastructural component are nil.
Imagine the X or libc developers said the same thing!
___
On 27 May 2009, Lennart Poettering outgrape:
> On Thu, 28.05.09 04:53, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
>
>> I think it is useful that you have the internal api calls so dbus is not
>> a requirement for communicating with PA.
>
> I am sorry to inform you that eventually PA wil
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 12/06/09 17:40 did gyre and gimble:
It would actually be nice if I wouldn't even have to roll tarballs
anymore but distros would get their stuff directly from the branch for
each release.
If it's good enough for glibc...
Col
--
Colin Guthrie
gmane(at
'Twas brillig, and Luke Yelavich at 13/06/09 02:49 did gyre and gimble:
I'll push the v0.9.15 tag now.
The extra patches you have added to your branch do not all apply
against a freshly downloaded and unpacked pulseaudio tarball, as I
indicated in my previous email. I think I listed at least a
13 matches
Mail list logo
