Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] starting multiple pulseaudio instances for the same user

2011-04-13 Thread Antoine Martin
On 04/13/2011 11:50 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Antoine Martin at 08/04/11 22:20 did gyre and gimble: >> Hi, >> >> How can I start multiple copies of pulseaudio for the same $USER, but in >> different contexts? >> This was working a while

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] starting multiple pulseaudio instances for the same user

2011-04-13 Thread Antoine Martin
n a fully up to date Fedora 14 system) Thanks Antoine On 04/09/2011 03:20 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: > Hi, > > How can I start multiple copies of pulseaudio for the same $USER, but in > different contexts? > This was working a while back (last year or so - not sure about versio

[pulseaudio-discuss] starting multiple pulseaudio instances for the same user

2011-04-08 Thread Antoine Martin
Hi, How can I start multiple copies of pulseaudio for the same $USER, but in different contexts? This was working a while back (last year or so - not sure about version numbers).. but doesn't any more? My software starts a virtual X server (xpra, vnc..), dbus and a dedicated pulseaudio server for

[pulseaudio-discuss] Fwd: Re: Python interface to pulse-audio

2010-05-14 Thread Antoine Martin
Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 23.01.08 14:36, Hynek Hanke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi! please, I just want to ask if there is some Python programming interface to PulseAudio or some bindings for the C library that one could use? I (as the maintainer of PA) am not aware of any suc

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] native-protocol-tcp vs esound-protocol-tcp

2010-05-14 Thread Antoine Martin
On 05/12/2010 03:54 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: On 05/12/2010 03:48 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: On 05/11/2010 11:29 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:21 +0700, Antoine Martin wrote: Add-to-wishlist: ability to use codecs here would be nice. I doesn't look like I can use l

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Python interface to pulse-audio

2010-05-14 Thread Antoine Martin
Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 23.01.08 14:36, Hynek Hanke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi! please, I just want to ask if there is some Python programming interface to PulseAudio or some bindings for the C library that one could use? I (as the maintainer of PA) am not aware of any such

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] native-protocol-tcp vs esound-protocol-tcp

2010-05-11 Thread Antoine Martin
On 05/12/2010 03:48 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: On 05/11/2010 11:29 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:21 +0700, Antoine Martin wrote: Add-to-wishlist: ability to use codecs here would be nice. I doesn't look like I can use ladspa plugins over the tunnel, or can I? If so

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] native-protocol-tcp vs esound-protocol-tcp

2010-05-11 Thread Antoine Martin
On 05/11/2010 11:29 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:21 +0700, Antoine Martin wrote: Add-to-wishlist: ability to use codecs here would be nice. I doesn't look like I can use ladspa plugins over the tunnel, or can I? If so, how? 1.4Mbit/s is a little high when most m

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] native-protocol-tcp vs esound-protocol-tcp

2010-05-10 Thread Antoine Martin
On 05/10/2010 11:50 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 22:46 +0700, Antoine Martin wrote: Are there any reasons to prefer native over esound? The one that I know is that the esound protocol doesn't provide latency information, which makes reliable lip-synced

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] native-protocol-tcp vs esound-protocol-tcp

2010-05-10 Thread Antoine Martin
Off-list, just to say: thank you very much! Antoine On 05/10/2010 11:50 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 22:46 +0700, Antoine Martin wrote: Are there any reasons to prefer native over esound? The one that I know is that the esound protocol doesn't provide la

[pulseaudio-discuss] native-protocol-tcp vs esound-protocol-tcp

2010-05-10 Thread Antoine Martin
Hi, I need to use some tcp transport (over an ssh tunnel) to forward sound from one box to another. Are there any reasons to prefer native over esound? Does anyone know what the bandwidth requirement is for either of these protocols? Is there a way to reduce the bandwidth used if I know in ad

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] module-tunnel.c: Server signalled buffer overrun/underrun

2009-09-28 Thread Antoine Martin
Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Antoine Martin at 28/09/09 07:53 did gyre and gimble: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to get some apps to talk to a seconday pa server, and >> redirect the output of that server to another (ie: the regular pa server >> on my

[pulseaudio-discuss] module-tunnel.c: Server signalled buffer overrun/underrun

2009-09-28 Thread Antoine Martin
Hi, I am trying to get some apps to talk to a seconday pa server, and redirect the output of that server to another (ie: the regular pa server on my machine) using pactl when desired, and fallback to null-sink when not present. I start the new server with: pulseaudio -n --start - --daemonize=