From: Ben Hughes
Make the should_to_s and is_to_s functions to return a form of 'redacted'.
Rather than send the password hash to system logs in cases of failure or
running in --noop mode, just state whether it's the new or old hash. We're
already doing this with password changes that work, so t
Update the desc block with information gleaned from #1469 and the code
about recurse => remote and other types of recursion.
The auto generated documentation was sparse and this is an area that often
comes up on the mailing list/IRC.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hughes
---
lib/puppet/type/file.rb | 12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ah, I hadn't realized that.
Also, what about Windows? Would this cover something there as well?
Trevor
On 03/31/2011 06:21 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Trevor Vaughan
> wrote:
>> Fair enough.
>>
>> nss: or nss_foo?
>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> Fair enough.
>
> nss: or nss_foo?
>
> According to nsswitch.conf(5) this would include:
Mac OS X uses /etc/{hosts,services,networks} but Name Service Switch
isn't meaningful at all.
I think we're getting too OS-flavor-specific in this thre
Fair enough.
nss: or nss_foo?
According to nsswitch.conf(5) this would include:
aliases
ethers
group -> Covered by 'group' type
hosts -> Covered by 'host' type
netgroup
networks
passwd -> Covered by 'user' type
protocols
publickey
rpc
services -> The one we want to cover
shadow -> Covered by 'us
On 31 March 2011 21:17, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's that easy.
>
> In Fedora, at least, network materials are grouped into the
> 'initscripts' package and items such as /etc/hosts and /etc/services
> are in the 'setup' package.
>
> You almost would need a LSB category to give thes
I'm not sure if it's that easy.
In Fedora, at least, network materials are grouped into the
'initscripts' package and items such as /etc/hosts and /etc/services
are in the 'setup' package.
You almost would need a LSB category to give these a really broad
header (where applicable).
I'm not sure i
On Mar 31, 4:45 pm, Jacob Helwig wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:16:31 -0400, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
> > I don't like 'port', but I'm having a hard time coming up with a good
> > alternate.
>
> > sys_service?
>
> > The man page says "The Internet network services list" so perhaps
> > net_svc or
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:16:31 -0400, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
> I don't like 'port', but I'm having a hard time coming up with a good
> alternate.
>
> sys_service?
>
> The man page says "The Internet network services list" so perhaps
> net_svc or net_service?
>
network_service, or net_service a
Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> I don't like 'port', but I'm having a hard time coming up with a good
> alternate.
>
> sys_service?
>
> The man page says "The Internet network services list" so perhaps
> net_svc or net_service?
>
I like net_service.
James
--
James Turnbull
Puppet Labs
1-503-734-857
I don't like 'port', but I'm having a hard time coming up with a good alternate.
sys_service?
The man page says "The Internet network services list" so perhaps
net_svc or net_service?
Trevor
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Stefan Schult
11 matches
Mail list logo
