When copying symlinks with 'links => manage', there is no need to
examine the content of the link target, since the link is supposed to be
copied as-is. Skip copying this value to the resource from the metadata
(source), since the content will be nil in the dangling symlink case.
Paired-with: Jac
Resource statuses and metrics for Whits were being added to reports. Since they
are transient internal data, they shouldn't be included in the report. This
change adds a Puppet::Transaction::Report#prune_internal_data method, called by
Puppet::Transaction::Report#finalize_report, providing a centra
Ruby < 1.8.7 doesn't have this method and we're using it in a test, so
tests won't run on 1.8.6 until this is in place.
It's probably a good thing to use much in implementation since it's
written in pure Ruby when using < 1.8.7 and in C when in > 1.8.7, but
then if you're using older Rubies you're
On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:42 AM, Markus Roberts wrote:
> Brice --
>
> > This is a rather complex set of structural changes. But to understand it
> > you
> > really only need to grasp two key sections; the rest is cleanup.
>
> Can you explain for people like me that didn't had time to try to
> under
On 08/04/11 18:19, James Turnbull wrote:
> Brice Figureau wrote:
>>
>> I still believe there is some more work and polishing to do on the part
>> that might end up in Statler. I'll try to devote some time soon on this
>> project.
>
> That'd be awesome. I think the release is next week right Nigel?
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Ahmed El Gamil wrote:
> @Nigel:
>
> Ubuntu packaging needs some love, no ?, looks like the puppetlabs APT
> repo has no puppet packages, and the package from ubuntu's official
> repos is still at 2.6.1 ..
The Debian and Ubuntu folks work together on the packaging.
Hello,
Working further with puppet, I need to be able to graph both nodes and
class dependencies to be able to diagnose issues and/or redundancies.
Currently, activating graph allows me to get ressources/dependencies
graphs per client.
But I would like to highlight nodes dependencies end inherit
[PATCH] (#6844) ./puppet.rb has a single case statement in self.[]
(param)
case seems needless here as there is only two opts, also the rest of
the file seems to use if so this should make things more consistant.
---
lib/puppet.rb |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
@Nigel:
Ubuntu packaging needs some love, no ?, looks like the puppetlabs APT
repo has no puppet packages, and the package from ubuntu's official
repos is still at 2.6.1 ..
On Mar 26, 12:37 am, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Thomas S Hatch wrot
Brice Figureau wrote:
>
> I still believe there is some more work and polishing to do on the part
> that might end up in Statler. I'll try to devote some time soon on this
> project.
That'd be awesome. I think the release is next week right Nigel?
>
> Side note:
> did the list config change? R
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:40 -0700, James Turnbull wrote:
> Nigel Kersten wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:29 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
> >
> >>> I'm also contemplating moving the patch outside of puppet core as Luke
> >>> was suggesting.
> >> I'm actually going to make a case with Nigel to mer
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:40 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
> Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:29 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
>>
I'm also contemplating moving the patch outside of puppet core as Luke
was suggesting.
>>> I'm actually going to make a case with Nigel to merge it in
Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:29 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
>
>>> I'm also contemplating moving the patch outside of puppet core as Luke
>>> was suggesting.
>> I'm actually going to make a case with Nigel to merge it into Statler
>> but I fear he may chase me around the office wi
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:29 AM, James Turnbull wrote:
>> I'm also contemplating moving the patch outside of puppet core as Luke
>> was suggesting.
>
> I'm actually going to make a case with Nigel to merge it into Statler
> but I fear he may chase me around the office with a shovel when I do. :)
Brice Figureau wrote:
> Yes, the code base is now a little bit old and at that time I still was
> on rspec 1.x or something.
It rebases fine on master and that test was the only incompatible issue.
>
> I plan to restart the development of this feature soon, especially
> adding the missing featur
Jacob Helwig wrote:
> Facter 1.5.9rc5 is a maintenance release containing fixes and updates.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 13 - 15 are available for testing.
Add the puppet.repo
Brice --
> This is a rather complex set of structural changes. But to understand it
> you
> > really only need to grasp two key sections; the rest is cleanup.
>
> Can you explain for people like me that didn't had time to try to
> understand the patch what it brings, how (roughly) the internals
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Except that it uses the -D option, so it should be alright. From
> install(1):
>
> -D create all leading components of DEST except the last, then
> copy SOURCE to DEST
all right, good catch. :)
~pete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 01:06 -0700, James Turnbull wrote:
> James Turnbull wrote:
> > Brice Figureau wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This is my Christmas Gift for the community :)
> >> That's something that was haunting me for a long time: a way to manage
> >> switch/routers directly from puppet.
> >> U
James Turnbull wrote:
> Brice Figureau wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is my Christmas Gift for the community :)
>> That's something that was haunting me for a long time: a way to manage
>> switch/routers directly from puppet.
>> Unfortunately most of the switches/routers don't run ruby natively and
>>
Brice Figureau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my Christmas Gift for the community :)
> That's something that was haunting me for a long time: a way to manage
> switch/routers directly from puppet.
> Unfortunately most of the switches/routers don't run ruby natively and
> as such can't run puppet.
>
Hi Markus,
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 16:41 -0700, Markus Roberts wrote:
> This is a rather complex set of structural changes. But to understand it you
> really only need to grasp two key sections; the rest is cleanup.
Can you explain for people like me that didn't had time to try to
understand the
22 matches
Mail list logo
