PuppetDB 0.9.1 is the second beta release on the road to 1.0. Changes
include bug fixes and performance improvements. For details on changes
in this release, please see the release notes below.
# Downloads
Available in native package format at
http://yum.puppetlabs.com
http://apt.puppetlabs.com
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Moses Mendoza wrote:
> Facter 1.6.10 is a maintenance release candidate in the 1.6.x branch with
> bug fixes.
>
> It includes contributions from Hailee Kenney, Josh Cooper, Jeff Weiss,
> Stefan Shulte, and Moses Mendoza.
>
> This release is available for download a
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 13:52 -0700, Luke Kanies wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Peter Meier wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >> I would really appreciate that. I recently moved a larger
> >> installation to 2.7 (latest) and I'm probably going back, as the
Documentation bugs:
1. Wrong location for example passenger configuration file at
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/dashboard/manual/1.2/bootstrapping.html
> Once Passenger is enabled, copy Dashboard’s example vhost from
> ext/dashboard-vhost.conf
The file is actually in ext/passenger/dashboard-vhost.
Repos should be back working now. Temporary glitch.
Regards
James
On Jun 14, 2012 12:08 PM, "Jo Rhett" wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Matthaus Litteken wrote:
>
> RPMs are available at https://yum.puppetlabs.com/el or /fedora
>
>
> https doesn't seem to work. http is working fine.
>
>
On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Matthaus Litteken wrote:
> RPMs are available at https://yum.puppetlabs.com/el or /fedora
https doesn't seem to work. http is working fine.
> *Significantly improve compilation performance when using modules
This appears to be a flat 9 seconds across a wide variety
This would be a great wiki page ;-)
On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Peter Meier wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, this is a group where y'all probably *can* deliver on
>>> this request:
>>>
>>> If you are experiencing poor performance, it would be awe
On Jun 13, 2012, at 8:52 AM, Luke Kanies wrote:
> Would you be willing to share your configs with us so we can do some
> performance analysis on them? Starting with known-slow configs would
> make a big difference.
I am no longer an employee at the shop, but a long time ago I sent our entire
ca
