On Jul 6, 2012, at 9:44 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
> Le 06/07/2012 18:27, Luke Kanies a écrit :
>> On Jul 6, 2012, at 9:24 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
>>
>>> Le 06/07/2012 18:07, Luke Kanies a écrit :
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:40 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
> Le 05/07/2012 19:00,
On 06/07/12 18:44, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
> Le 06/07/2012 18:27, Luke Kanies a écrit :
>> On Jul 6, 2012, at 9:24 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
>>
>>> Le 06/07/2012 18:07, Luke Kanies a écrit :
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:40 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
> Le 05/07/2012 19:00, Daniel Pitt
On 06/07/12 18:58, Andrew Parker wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2012, at 2:07 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
>
>>
>>> By moving a couple of things around I think we can cache those
>>> calls instead of needing to keep the cache of not found types.
>>> We'll keep you posted on what we come up with.
>>
>> Thank
On Jul 6, 2012, at 2:07 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
>
>> By moving a couple of things around I think we can cache those calls
>> instead of needing to keep the cache of not found types. We'll keep
>> you posted on what we come up with.
>
> Thanks, I'm looking forward to that!
Brice, maybe you ca
Le 06/07/2012 18:27, Luke Kanies a écrit :
On Jul 6, 2012, at 9:24 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
Le 06/07/2012 18:07, Luke Kanies a écrit :
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:40 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
Le 05/07/2012 19:00, Daniel Pittman a écrit :
That would ... probably not show a lot of short-ter
On Jul 6, 2012, at 9:24 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
> Le 06/07/2012 18:07, Luke Kanies a écrit :
>> On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:40 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
>>
>>> Le 05/07/2012 19:00, Daniel Pittman a écrit :
That would ... probably not show a lot of short-term performance gain
for you.
Le 06/07/2012 18:07, Luke Kanies a écrit :
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:40 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
Le 05/07/2012 19:00, Daniel Pittman a écrit :
That would ... probably not show a lot of short-term performance gain
for you. The static compiler,
We tested (and proposed some fixes (pull request
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:40 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
> Le 05/07/2012 19:00, Daniel Pittman a écrit :
>>
>> That would ... probably not show a lot of short-term performance gain
>> for you. The static compiler,
>>
> We tested (and proposed some fixes (pull request #769)) and that looks
> inter
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 17:11 -0700, Andrew Parker wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Brice Figureau wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Absolutely agree. Andy and team are working hard on exactly this.
> >
> > That's really good. I'm going to try to profile one of my largest node
> > agent (in noop mode) to se
Le 05/07/2012 19:00, Daniel Pittman a écrit :
That would ... probably not show a lot of short-term performance gain
for you. The static compiler,
We tested (and proposed some fixes (pull request #769)) and that looks interesting but static compiler as some bad side
effect which are removing s
10 matches
Mail list logo
