On Feb 16, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Ryan Bowlby wrote:
> Let me preface this with the fact that I use, and love, Puppet. Feel free to
> skip to the feature requests.
>
> - BEGIN RANT --
>
> Is it really worth the effort to re-implement the features already available
> in ruby within the pupp
On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> I've been playing with how to do this but nothing obvious is working.
>
> I can specify the parent for both the type and provider but the methods,
> parameters, and properties don't seem to come along for the ride.
>
> In particular, I want
I've been playing with how to do this but nothing obvious is working.
I can specify the parent for both the type and provider but the methods,
parameters, and properties don't seem to come along for the ride.
In particular, I want everything that the File type currently provides but
to override a
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, fatmcgav wrote:
>
> On 18 February 2013 10:50, Andy Parker wrote:
>
>> I just took a look and see that you got no responses on puppet-users.
>> That is unfortunate :(
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Gavin Williams wrote:
>>
>>> Morning All
>>>
>>> I poste
Not sure if this was mentioned yet but since many environments ssh key
management styles will be different, why not make puppet "auto-require"
the resource and have it downloaded before compile time. There could be an
official key/value map in order to tell puppet which module to use and
where
On 18.02.2013 15:28, Andy Parker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:14 AM, David Schmitt mailto:da...@dasz.at>> wrote:
On 18.02.2013 12:52, Andy Parker wrote:
I think publishing this on the forge would be a great idea. It does
leave open the question of what we should be doing
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:14 AM, David Schmitt wrote:
> On 18.02.2013 12:52, Andy Parker wrote:
>
>> I think publishing this on the forge would be a great idea. It does
>> leave open the question of what we should be doing with the things that
>> are already in core. It is a shame to have them ro
On 18.02.2013 12:52, Andy Parker wrote:
I think publishing this on the forge would be a great idea. It does
leave open the question of what we should be doing with the things that
are already in core. It is a shame to have them rot and force everyone
to download another module to get working ssh_
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Jeff McCune wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Lukas Hetzenecker <
> lukas.hetzenec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> i developed a module for puppet that handles the ssh key management in a
>> saner way.
>> The biggest shortcomings of the ssh_author
Andy,
Cheers for taking the time to respond...
Comments in-line below...
Cheers
Gavin
On 18 February 2013 10:50, Andy Parker wrote:
> I just took a look and see that you got no responses on puppet-users. That
> is unfortunate :(
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Gavin Williams wrote:
>
>>
I just took a look and see that you got no responses on puppet-users. That
is unfortunate :(
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Gavin Williams wrote:
> Morning All
>
> I posted this on Puppet-users a few days ago, but I thought i'd post it on
> here aswell to get a Dev's view-point...
>
> Firstly
Hi Jaska,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jaska Kivelä wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We are a bit concerned about the way Puppet runs the ERB templates. It is
> hard coded that they be run on $SAFE level 0.
> This means that whatever Ruby code someone decides to write in a template
> will be run with th
On 15.02.2013 18:22, Akom The Benevolent wrote:
In my company binaries for deployment are released into an FTPS repo
(and are not packages). The simplest option of making them available
via *puppet:///* urls is to constantly sync the FTPS contents to the
modules directory on the master, but the
Morning All
I posted this on Puppet-users a few days ago, but I thought i'd post it on
here aswell to get a Dev's view-point...
Firstly, apologies for the length of this post, however I thought it
probably most useful to fully outline the challenge and the desired
result...
Ok, so we're in
14 matches
Mail list logo
