On 2013-26-03 22:57, Eric Sorenson wrote:
Similar to ARM-0, this mail is to submit ARM-1, which simply contains the
templates/writing prompts for creating new arms, to this august body for its
consideration. This one has actually undergone substantial revision in its
"Posted" state and hopeful
On 2013-26-03 22:32, Eric Sorenson wrote:
In an amusing twist of recursion, we're testing out the ARM process defined in ARM-0[1]
first on ARM-0 itself. We'll move the other ones along in the process this afternoon, but
this got to the point in the workflow where we "declare 1.0" and submit it
Similar to ARM-0, this mail is to submit ARM-1, which simply contains the
templates/writing prompts for creating new arms, to this august body for its
consideration. This one has actually undergone substantial revision in its
"Posted" state and hopefully provides a good way for new ARMs to start
In an amusing twist of recursion, we're testing out the ARM process defined in
ARM-0[1] first on ARM-0 itself. We'll move the other ones along in the process
this afternoon, but this got to the point in the workflow where we "declare
1.0" and submit it to governors (basically anyone who cares to
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013, James Turnbull wrote:
> Andy Parker wrote:
> > We've also got djmitche in the office helping jmccune out with SSL
> > certificate chaining so that we can say (and have tested and documented)
> > that puppet really does support certificates that are issued by other
> > s
Andy Parker wrote:
> We've also got djmitche in the office helping jmccune out with SSL
> certificate chaining so that we can say (and have tested and documented)
> that puppet really does support certificates that are issued by other
> systems rather than by the puppet certificate commands.
Does
