Re: [Puppet-dev] Module team update: 2013-07-07 - 2013-07-12

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Ashley Penney wrote: > but I believe our intent was that the first 1.0.0 would have a stable API > and I think that was why it's still considered a 0. release. I think he > wanted to do a few more things in terms of the parameters before calling it > a 1.0. Thi

Re: [Puppet-dev] Module team update: 2013-07-07 - 2013-07-12

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:10 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > > If it was a huge change shouldn't it be semantically versioned and up'ed > to 1.x.x? > Hopefully hunner will reply directly himself rather than me putting words in his mouth, but I believe our intent was that the first 1.0.0 would have a

Re: [Puppet-dev] Module team update: 2013-07-07 - 2013-07-12

Ashley Penney wrote: > Hello! > > Now that we're two weeks in it's time for another update on what's been > going on in the module team. We focused on puppetlabs-ntp and > puppetlabs-firewall as our two primary modules, but also merged in fixes > to passenger, rabbitmq, mysql, apt, and apache. >

[Puppet-dev] Module team update: 2013-07-07 - 2013-07-12

Hello! Now that we're two weeks in it's time for another update on what's been going on in the module team. We focused on puppetlabs-ntp and puppetlabs-firewall as our two primary modules, but also merged in fixes to passenger, rabbitmq, mysql, apt, and apache. As a result of this work we've rel

Re: [Puppet-dev] Windows Specific Facts

Agreed, the sp_ prefix is unfortunate. It's to indicate they came from System Profiler. On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:43 PM, "Dustin J. Mitchell" wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Rob Reynolds wrote: >> My initial thought is that we should use something like win_ but I wanted to >> check to s

Re: [Puppet-dev] Windows Specific Facts

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Rob Reynolds wrote: > My initial thought is that we should use something like win_ but I wanted to > check to see if there is a better prefix that we should use. I think that makes a lot more sense than "sp_", which doesn't, to me, suggest OS X. Dustin -- You r

Re: [Puppet-dev] Cisco Networkdevice Module

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Brice Figureau < brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com> wrote: > On 12/07/13 18:04, Andy Parker wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Nan Liu > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Brice Figureau > > >

Re: [Puppet-dev] Cisco Networkdevice Module

On 12/07/13 18:04, Andy Parker wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Nan Liu > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Brice Figureau > > wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 03:52 -0700, Markus Burger wrote

Re: [Puppet-dev] Cisco Networkdevice Module

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Nan Liu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Brice Figureau < > brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 03:52 -0700, Markus Burger wrote: >> > We just released an internally developed puppet-networkdevice module >> > in the hope that

Re: [Puppet-dev] Cisco Networkdevice Module

On 12 July 2013 16:55, Nan Liu wrote: > > So now that we have this module, is it time to remove all the cisco >> stuff from the core, and leave only the base network device mechanism >> (possibly enriched by some of the functionalities this module provides)? > > > +1, it's always harder to iterat

Re: [Puppet-dev] Cisco Networkdevice Module

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Brice Figureau < brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 03:52 -0700, Markus Burger wrote: > > We just released an internally developed puppet-networkdevice module > > in the hope that some other folks might be interested in it :). > Awesome!

Re: [Puppet-dev] Cisco Networkdevice Module

Hi Markus, On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 03:52 -0700, Markus Burger wrote: > We just released an internally developed puppet-networkdevice module > in the hope that some other folks might be interested in it :). This is very interesting! > It's currently still in an early stage but should be pretty usab

[Puppet-dev] Cisco Networkdevice Module

We just released an internally developed puppet-networkdevice module in the hope that some other folks might be interested in it :). It's currently still in an early stage but should be pretty usable for the basic usecases. -> https://github.com/uniak/puppet-networkdevice ## Overview The Cisc