On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, John Bollinger
wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, October 28, 2013 11:54:25 AM UTC-5, Rob Reynolds wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:42 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, October 28, 2013 2:55:32 AM UTC-5, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
D
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:59 PM, John Bollinger
wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, October 28, 2013 11:54:25 AM UTC-5, Rob Reynolds wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:42 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, October 28, 2013 2:55:32 AM UTC-5, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
De
[...snip...]
>
>
>
>
>> Would you always want to specify 'SYSTEM' and 'Administrators' in every
>> acl or would that get old having to specify for items that are already
>> going to be inherited?
>>
>
>
> No, I think the usual Puppet paradigm should apply: you specify only those
> resources and pro
On Monday, October 28, 2013 11:54:25 AM UTC-5, Rob Reynolds wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:42 AM, jcbollinger
>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, October 28, 2013 2:55:32 AM UTC-5, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Den fredag den 25. oktober 2013 22.10.40 UTC+2 skrev Rob Reynolds:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:42 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, October 28, 2013 2:55:32 AM UTC-5, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Den fredag den 25. oktober 2013 22.10.40 UTC+2 skrev Rob Reynolds:
>>
> [...]
>
>> The format could look something like the following:
>>>
>>> acl { 'c:/windows/
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
>
>
> Den fredag den 25. oktober 2013 22.10.40 UTC+2 skrev Rob Reynolds:
>
>> tl;dr: Windows manages permissions in a way that doesn't always translate
>> well to mode. We're putting together a solution for this. Jump in the
>> discussion.
>>
