On 11/07/2014 05:59 AM, Luke Kanies wrote:
To get a behavior that matches today's resources type, we'd need to
explicitly query unmanaged resources.
User~| managed == false |~ { ensure = absent }
This has the advantage of being more explicit about the unmanaged part than
On 11/04/2014 10:46 PM, Josh Cooper wrote:
2. Change --test to imply --debug instead of --verbose
I don't think this is an option.
Many users are likely in the habit of using --test whenever actually
testing or even manually running the catalog from the master. The
percentage of those that
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 8:37:08 PM UTC-6, henrik lindberg wrote:
Hi,
I am bringing up this topic because of a recent discussion and PR for
the ticket https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-1486
Here is a recap.
The Resources resource is used to manage unmanaged resources of
On Nov 4, 2014 6:32 AM, tracyde trac...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to ruby development and want to integrate my report parser with
TravisCI. I have read articles and blog posts on how to integrate Puppet
modules with rspec, puppet-lint, and travisci but those are not directly
applicable to
On Fri Nov 07 2014 at 5:29:15 PM John Bollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org
wrote:
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 8:37:08 PM UTC-6, henrik lindberg wrote:
Hi,
I am bringing up this topic because of a recent discussion and PR for
the ticket https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-1486
** Next PR Triage Wednesday, November 12th @ 10:00 am Pacific. **
Priorities
1.
Puppet 3.7.4
2.
Native Facter 0.3.0
3.
Puppet-server 0.4.0
4.
Code removal for puppet 4
5.
New puppet doc implementation
Commentary
This email is being put together a little
On 2014-07-11 17:29, John Bollinger wrote:
Having said all that, I can completely get behind Luke's idea to provide
for client-side queries.
I am +1 on that too. Much better idea.
You can forget my earlier proposals.
- henrik
--
Visit my Blog Puppet on the Edge
On 2014-07-11 18:28, Erik Dalén wrote:
On Fri Nov 07 2014 at 5:29:15 PM John Bollinger
john.bollin...@stjude.org mailto:john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
Having said all that, I can completely get behind Luke's idea to
provide for client-side queries. I am confused, however, as to why
