anges, and prompting users to ensure they are
pinning versions as appropriate.
Thanks for the assistance of igalic and _rc on #puppet-dev.
Cheers
Gavin
[1]
https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs_spec_helper/commit/1c23917f60f64e4fbf7b9effdb212f907656826f
[2]
https://github.com/fatmcgav/fatmcgav
Hunter
Have given it a quick test, and that seems to have worked :D
Cheers for the pointer...
Gav
On 6 June 2014 21:53, Hunter Haugen wrote:
> Another option might be to call the facts indirector with the
> network_device terminus from the confine block itself... Something like
>
> confine
have
made it into this release.
As always, feel free to drop me a line or respond to this message with any
questions/issues.
Cheers again.
Gavin
[1] http://forge.puppetlabs.com/fatmcgav/netapp/0.4.0
[2] https://github.com/fatmcgav/fatmcgav-netapp/blob/v0.4-fixes/CHANGELOG
--
You received
#x27;flush'.
'Flush' then calls the user modification if required...
Seems to work quite well from my testing :)
Latest code is:
https://github.com/fatmcgav/fatmcgav-netapp/blob/master/lib/puppet/provider/netapp_user/netapp_user.rb
Cheers
Gavin
On 5 April 2013 11:15, Luke Kanies wr
sh, however am
> struggling to differentiate between what is a resource creation, and what
> is a modification...
> Code is here:
> https://github.com/fatmcgav/fatmcgav-netapp/commit/66092978f4182c5474a60011db99ee2e3e12e689
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers
> Gavin
>
> On
of code tweaks up -
> https://github.com/fatmcgav/fatmcgav-netapp/commit/7a7d18bf39cdbb04a3b0b5192929ec6a857c0a5e
>
> Need to tidy the code up a bit, but should be able to get the gist :) Have
> got a couple of defs which pull back the bulk of the information, and then
> a couple t
s. Because 'instances' isn't used for this
> kind of test, the base class ships with a stub method that just throws an
> error.
>
> So yeah, all that's confusing, and could really use some additional work
> to make it easier to understand, and to bring some consiste
3, and then populated it with a
> whole load of device output on line 18 :(
>
> So have defined a 'qtree_instances' array on the outside to contain my
> output, with qtrees being used on the inside to hold the NetApp filer
> response... Latest code in
> Github<https:/
Nan
Cheers for confirming, I kinda guessed as much...
Would it work if the module wasn't installed in the main lib dir, but in
the environment specific dirs?
Cheers
Gav
On Mar 7, 2013 9:34 PM, "Nan Liu" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:23 AM, devon wrote:
>
>> I recall running into similar
n the morn... As time for bed here :)
Cheers
Gav
On 1 March 2013 21:42, fatmcgav wrote:
> No worries, I guessed as much given all the recent puppet vmware news :-)
>
> Will take a look, and have a play.
>
> Cheers
> Gav
> On Mar 1, 2013 9:41 PM, "Nan Liu" wro
No worries, I guessed as much given all the recent puppet vmware news :-)
Will take a look, and have a play.
Cheers
Gav
On Mar 1, 2013 9:41 PM, "Nan Liu" wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:50 PM, fatmcgav wrote:
>
>> Did you have any joy with updating the code?
>
Nan
Did you have any joy with updating the code?
Cheers
Gavin
On 20 February 2013 16:43, fatmcgav wrote:
> Nan,
>
> Cheers for the feedback...
>
> Will keep an eye out for your email :)
>
> Cheers
> Gavin
>
>
> On 20 February 2013 16:41, Nan Liu wrote:
>
Nan,
Cheers for the feedback...
Will keep an eye out for your email :)
Cheers
Gavin
On 20 February 2013 16:41, Nan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Gavin Williams wrote:
>
>> Ok, I've started trying to work up some code to outline the change
>> below...
>>
>> However I'm hitting
Andy
I would certainly +1 that request... Could use this case as an example
aswell if you wanted...
Cheers
Gav
On 19 February 2013 08:20, Andrew Parker wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Nan Liu wrote:
>
> I'll admit, though, that puppet doesn't really have a concept of an "in
>>> progres
13 at 3:21 AM, fatmcgav wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18 February 2013 10:50, Andy Parker wrote:
>>
>>> I just took a look and see that you got no responses on puppet-users.
>>> That is unfortunate :(
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Gavin Williams
Andy,
Cheers for taking the time to respond...
Comments in-line below...
Cheers
Gavin
On 18 February 2013 10:50, Andy Parker wrote:
> I just took a look and see that you got no responses on puppet-users. That
> is unfortunate :(
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Gavin Williams wrote:
>
>>
Ken
Cheers for the response.
Will have a read and see if I can work it out :)
Cheers
Gavin
On 12 February 2013 16:13, Ken Barber wrote:
> This is certainly how we handle the firewall/iptables case, using
> properties and a late flush:
>
>
> https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-firewall/b
s given short shrift.
>
>
>> Have pushed my first set of commits to
>> Git<https://github.com/fatmcgav/fatmcgav-netapp/commits/rspec-tests>- Am
>> using a combination of
>> Puppetlabs_spec_helper<http://puppetlabs.com/blog/the-next-generation-of-puppet-module-testin
is failing with:
>> Puppet::Provider::Netapp_volume autoincrement=: Setting of auto-increment
>> for volume v_puppet_test020120131713 failed due to execution expired.
>>
>> The latest code changes were made under:
>> https://github.com/fatmcgav/fatmcgav-netapp/co
Nan
Cheers for info.
Will drop the notify out and see how it behaves.
However shouldn't the other resources on the define still run?
They work correctly outside of a define, so I know it's not a provider
issue.
Cheers
Gav
On Dec 20, 2012 6:08 PM, "Nan Liu" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:2
20 matches
Mail list logo
