-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This might just do it.
I feel like I tried this and it didn't work but I'll give it another shot.
Thanks!
Trevor
On 11/22/2011 03:10 AM, Dan Bode wrote:
> You could use the resource_type indirection to query all of the resource
> types and select t
Hi
In the case of a default node, regexp nodes or an external node
classifier, there *is* no well-defined "list of potential nodes" any more.
Having said that, a solution might be to use the puppet compiler's
internals to parse the site.pp and friends "manually" and access the AST
resulting fro
Hi Trevor,
In the case of a default node, regexp nodes or an external node
classifier, there *is* no well-defined "list of potential nodes" any more.
Having said that, a solution might be to use the puppet compiler's
internals to parse the site.pp and friends "manually" and access the AST
resulti
You could use the resource_type indirection to query all of the resource
types and select the ones of type node.
This will only query the nodes that were specified in manifests (which is
quite different from all of the nodes that have checked in)
Below is some example code:
require "puppet/face"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the suggestions guys but I'm giving this one up as too annoying to
bother.
The issue was to detect the nodes that hadn't checked in but were defined in
the manifest.
Getting the information out of the YAML is pretty easy, yes.
Thanks!
Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> Thanks James.
>
> I knew how to do that, I was actually trying to figure out if I could do it
> the hard way by delving the manifests instead of having to wait for a
> system to check in.
>
> I'm pretty close to saying that the answer is 'no'.
>
Oh I see. You mean befor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks James.
I knew how to do that, I was actually trying to figure out if I could do it the
hard way by delving the manifests instead of having to wait for a
system to check in.
I'm pretty close to saying that the answer is 'no'.
Thanks,
Trevor
Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> Sorry but...bump?
>
> On 11/18/2011 02:20 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>> Sorry if this is a double post, my e-mail glitched on me.
>
>> Anyway, I'm trying to write a Ruby script that can get all defined
>> nodes and all classes assigned to those nodes. I would prefer to not
