On Feb 27, 2009, at 10:29 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
>> The big reason I thought about using parameters was just that we
>> might
>> need to version the overall API (the split between environment,
>> resource type, and resource key) separ
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:
> The big reason I thought about using parameters was just that we might
> need to version the overall API (the split between environment,
> resource type, and resource key) separately from the resource type API
> (any formatting within the key
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 06:45:12PM -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Eric Gerlach wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:47:36PM -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
> >> Your points are definitely valid. This is the closest (and best)
> >> discussion I've found:
> >>
> >> ht
On Feb 27, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Eric Gerlach wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:47:36PM -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
>> Your points are definitely valid. This is the closest (and best)
>> discussion I've found:
>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/389169/best-practices-for-api-versioning
>
> Ac
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:47:36PM -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
> Your points are definitely valid. This is the closest (and best)
> discussion I've found:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/389169/best-practices-for-api-versioning
Actually, that's a really good treatment of the subject.
>
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Eric Gerlach wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:02:08PM -0800, Luke Kanies wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 21, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Luke Kanies
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I could see some other version numbers makin
On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Luke Kanies
> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 21, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Luke Kanies
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I could see some other version numbers making t
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:02:08PM -0800, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Luke Kanies wrote:
> >
> >
> > I could see some other version numbers making their way to the URI at
> > some point, but those would like
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>>
>>
>> I could see some other version numbers making their way to the URI at
>> some point, but those would likely be per-resour
On Feb 21, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Ohad Levy wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
>
> I could see some other version numbers making their way to the URI at
> some point, but those would likely be per-resource, rather than site-
> wide, and each resource type has a lot of
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
>
> I could see some other version numbers making their way to the URI at
> some point, but those would likely be per-resource, rather than site-
> wide, and each resource type has a lot of control over how its portion
> of the URI is managed.
On Feb 21, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been thinking about how to solve
>> http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1557
>> -- Environments should be in fileserving URIs.
>>
>> As I was implementing the
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been thinking about how to solve
> http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1557
> -- Environments should be in fileserving URIs.
>
> As I was implementing the plugin support, I realized that the format
> of the URI is act
13 matches
Mail list logo
