On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:40:25PM -0800, Paul Berry wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Stefan Schulte <
> stefan.schu...@taunusstein.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm not really satisfied with the mount provider and I tried to explain
> > that in »Refactoring mounttype«.
> >
>
> Ah, thanks for po
P & S --
The one I currently dont know how to address (besides splitting the
> current type in two fstab-only mount-only types) is #5991
>
I have to say that this one appeals to me a lot for some reason, though I'm
not as deep in the weeds as the two of you and may be missing subtleties. I
think
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:40:25PM -0800, Paul Berry wrote:
>
> Yes, my intention was that we overwrite flush in a way that does umount
> before. In fact, the order of operations I had in mind was:
> 1. umount anything that needs unmounting (this includes both resources that
> have { ensure => un
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Stefan Schulte <
stefan.schu...@taunusstein.net> wrote:
>
> I'm not really satisfied with the mount provider and I tried to explain
> that in »Refactoring mounttype«.
>
Ah, thanks for pointing that out. I saw that e-mail when you sent it but I
didn't give it the
