Could you please paste the entire script? Theoretically it should
produce output.
If you use the script from here:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Puppet_Version_Control
it should work just fine! Copy / paste the script and see if it
helps.
On Dec 10, 4:15 pm,
I just wondered if anyone has experience of this kind of problem, and
what approaches they've
found to work best.
I'm writing my first type/provider (on pupet 0.25.x) to automatically
setup RabbitMQ.
The basic approach I'm taking is to wrap the rabbitmqctl command
(which lets you create vhosts,
Can you follow the path our user providers use and simply provide the
internal hash in the manifest? Can you verify that client side?
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Dick Davies
rasput...@hellooperator.net wrote:
I just wondered if anyone has experience of this kind of problem, and
what
Thanks everyone for all the tips on where I can get pp files for
testing.
Very helpful.
Some answers to questions below:
On Dec 10, 2010, at 11:32 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
I wonder if there is a set of pp files available for testing the
parser.
Puppet labs don't have a hidden repository
On Dec 10, 7:15 am, a.gorodin...@mail.ru a.gorodin...@mail.ru
wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to use pre-commit SVN hook for checking puppet syntax. For
it I try to use some scripts from this
thread:http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/50ff...
But when I try some of
- henrik
11 dec 2010 kl. 19:28 skrev Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Henrik Lindberg
henrik.lindberg.priv...@gmail.com wrote:
I have created an EMF ecore model for puppet manifests. The technology I use
(Xtext) helps with generating a .pp parser
I noticed the posts about a ruby DSL, and I was wondering what the
future plan is for this functionality. I _just_ noticed this.
Originally I was drawn to puppet because of the declarative nature of
the DSL and frankly, because I am not that familiar with Ruby.
Are we moving towards ruby as
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Kevin Beckford lazy...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed the posts about a ruby DSL, and I was wondering what the future
plan is for this functionality. I _just_ noticed this.
Originally I was drawn to puppet because of the declarative nature of the
DSL and
That's very good to hear, the DSL was much nicer to work with in this
domain then Ruby was, for the non Ruby user. I was viewing the DSL like
django's template language, or similar, and that helped a great deal.
Thanks for the quick reply.
--
You received this message because you are
Howdy folks!
I gave a presentation this week to some fellow puppeteers. It covers:
* Style
* Truth (deployment truth, machine truth, extlookup, rightscale tags, etc)
* Nodeless puppet (pure fact-driven manifests, no nodes defined)
* Masterless puppet (no puppet master)
* Exported resources
On 8/12/2010 9:54 PM, Adrian wrote:
Hello everybody,
Is there a way when installing a package like this :
package { rubygems:
ensure = installed,
}
to pass -t parameter to apt-get in order to use a specific apt
source ? EG : apt-get install -t lenny-backports rubygems
That'd essentially be option 1 then.
I think it'd be doable (have seen that work well in e.g. camptocamps mysql
module) but I'd need to call into Erlang somehow to find the hashed
password.
In the mysql case, it's just a straight select out of the mysql.user table.
One other idea I had was to
12 matches
Mail list logo
