On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Rob McBroom wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Howard Jones wrote:
>
>> I have a couple of applications (backup, Cacti, Asset Tracking) where I want
>> a node to have some package and config installed, and once that is done,
>> some config to be done on anothe
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 06:47, Jed wrote:
>> is this possible?
>
> Probably not usefully to you, no. You might better aim to integrate a
> stage into your host build process that will generate the certificate
> on the server and allow it t
I'm using puppet 0.25.5 and just discovered two file resource bugs. I
suspect the bugs did not exist in 0.24 because the code were using that
triggers them has been the same for a long time and while it is possible we
did not notice the problem earlier, it seems unlikely as it has been
triggering f
Hi,
Have you thought about building the Solaris packages against the
Oracle provided Sun Web Stack. This replaced the older Coolstack.
It just means that you don't have to own and package Ruby for Solaris.
https://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_SMI-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProduct
Hi,
Try the following in puppet.conf on the client side:
[main]
server = puppet.test.ch
certname =puppet.test.ch
...
...
Vladimir
On Feb 1, 5:26 pm, Pascal wrote:
> Yes, they have exact the same system time.
>
> maybe this /var/log/puppet/masterhttp.log will give you more
> information:
> (cli
Hi,
You only need to set the location of the ssl directory in the [main] section of
the puppet..
If you are using puppet with apache/passenger you need to put apache in the
puppet group.
Create the ssl directory first by running puppetmasterd once.
The other thing to watch is the versions o
Hi all,
We here at Puppet Labs are proud to announce Puppet Enterprise, which we
launched today:
http://www.puppetlabs.com/puppet-enterprise/
We've worked pretty hard to get it out the door, and in particular our team has
worked very hard to get great packages for all of the Puppet projects an
Jeff, Thanks for answering this question in detail. It is greatly
appreciated. I have everything working as is now but want to get the
ssl signing corrected as I just point to a dedicated ca, if I can get
this handled all through the mod_ssl proxy that would be ideal.
Ill post back with any fur
On 01.02.2011, at 18:14, Brice Figureau wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:30 -0500, Ashley Penney wrote:
>> This is the crux of the situation for me too - Puppetlabs blame it on
>> a Ruby bug that hasn't been resolved with RHEL6 (in my situation) but
>> this wasn't an issue until .3 for me too.
On 01/02/11 20:35, Ashley Penney wrote:
> Yes, it didn't happen with the earlier versions of 2.6.
If it's easy for you to reproduce the issue you really should git bisect
the issue and tell puppetlabs what commit is the root cause (the
differences between 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 is not that big).
This way
Yes, it didn't happen with the earlier versions of 2.6.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Brice Figureau <
brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:30 -0500, Ashley Penney wrote:
> > This is the crux of the situation for me too - Puppetlabs blame it on
> > a Ruby bug that h
The virtual user is in a class, that class is included at the
basenode. I did put a log message in there and on the master it is
loading the class. From the master perspective it looks like
everything is fine.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
> Really silly question here, is the vir
Really silly question here, is the virtual user in a class? In the
basenode are you including the class that contains the virtual user?
If the virtual user is in a class, can you put a notify resource in
there to make sure the class is included as expected?
HTH,
Nan
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:39
I tried what you suggested and it seems to have made no difference, I
am still getting the same error.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Jeff McCune wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Matthew Black wrote:
>> Inside my basenode definiton, which is being inherited by another node
>> definition
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Matthew Black wrote:
> Inside my basenode definiton, which is being inherited by another node
> definition it is doing
>
> realize(User["admin"],Group["admin"])
>
> The strange thing is if remove the specified node definition and just
> have the basenode it works co
Inside my basenode definiton, which is being inherited by another node
definition it is doing
realize(User["admin"],Group["admin"])
The strange thing is if remove the specified node definition and just
have the basenode it works correctly.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Jeff McCune wrote:
> H
How are you realizing the user?
--
Jeff McCune - (+1-503-208-4484)
On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Matt wrote:
> I have this problem where I'm trying to create a user and the error
> message I am getting is:
>
> err: Could not run Puppet configuration client: Could not find user
> admin
>
> Here i
I have this problem where I'm trying to create a user and the error
message I am getting is:
err: Could not run Puppet configuration client: Could not find user
admin
Here is what I have in the manifest and I am realizing the user at the
basenode level and all my nodes inherit the basenode.
Hello Mark,
I ran into trouble using symlinks with puppet/puppetmaster as puppet
would manage them directly and actually remove them. I know there is the
ability to tell puppet NOT to do this but I didn't explore that option.
At this point, I have puppetmaster/passenger now running on
/etc/p
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:30 -0500, Ashley Penney wrote:
> This is the crux of the situation for me too - Puppetlabs blame it on
> a Ruby bug that hasn't been resolved with RHEL6 (in my situation) but
> this wasn't an issue until .3 for me too. I feel that fact that many
> of us have this problem s
Dave,
Just wondering if you tried to make a temporary symlink from
/var/lib/puppet/ssl to /etc/puppet/ssl to see if the error changes or goes away
(just to narrow the scope)?
Also, take a look at http://blog.kumina.nl/2011/01/puppet-on-puppetmaster/ --
perhaps you're missing an ssldir declarat
I have been working on converting puppetmaster to use passenger and I
can't seem to get past this error message:
Could not prepare for execution: Got 1 failure(s) while initializing:
change from absent to directory failed: Could not set 'directory on
ensure: Permission denied - /etc/puppet/ssl
Yes, they have exact the same system time.
maybe this /var/log/puppet/masterhttp.log will give you more
information:
(client is client1.test.ch, server is puppet.test.ch)
[2011-02-01 17:00:08] INFO
Certificate:
Data:
Version: 3 (0x2)
Serial Number: 7 (0x7)
Signature A
Hi,
is the time on both hosts (puppet master and puppet client) in sync?
see http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Certificates_And_Security
Kind regards,
Martin
On Feb 1, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Pascal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use Debian 5.0.8 with puppet 6.2.6.
> I've got the following probl
This is the crux of the situation for me too - Puppetlabs blame it on a Ruby
bug that hasn't been resolved with RHEL6 (in my situation) but this wasn't
an issue until .3 for me too. I feel that fact that many of us have this
problem since upgrading means it can be fixed within Puppet, rather than
try putting an entry for puppet into hosts; its detailed somewhere in the
docs i think
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Pascal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use Debian 5.0.8 with puppet 6.2.6.
> I've got the following problem after installing puppet and registering
> the certificates:
>
>
> client1:/home/pa
hello everybody!
server:
[awasilyev@puppet ~]$ rpm -q puppet-server
puppet-server-2.6.4-0.7.el5
client:
[root@opensource ~]# rpm -q puppet
puppet-2.6.4-0.7.el5
[root@opensource ~]# puppetd -t
info: Creating a new SSL key for opensource.vm.griddynamics.net
warning: peer certificate won't be verif
On 01/31/2011 08:22 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
Hi! Gary seems kind enough to provide the build script, so I was able
to package 2.6.4:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1075709/puppet-2.6.4%2CREV%3D2011.01.04-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg
Please note this is not official and only briefly tested, please feel
free to prov
Hi,
I use Debian 5.0.8 with puppet 6.2.6.
I've got the following problem after installing puppet and registering
the certificates:
client1:/home/pascal# puppetd --server=puppet.test.ch --debug --no-
daemonize --verbose --waitforcert 60
debug: Failed to load library 'selinux' for feature 'selinux
Is it possible for puppet to configure a set of MySQL masters and
manage circular replication, so that if additional master nodes are
required (or need to be stopped & moved) puppet can add them to the
set and bring them "up to date"? How would it cope with unresponsive
nodes; could puppet reconfig
On 01/28/2011 11:51 PM, Dan Urist wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:40:38 -0800
> Nan Liu wrote:
>
>> You can require disable_upstart class as a conditional by operating
>> system and it should be part of your ssh module rather than a separate
>> class.
>
> If I understand correctly, you mean I sh
Hi,
On 31.01.2011, at 22:50, John Warburton wrote:
> On 1 February 2011 08:43, Brice Figureau
> wrote:
> On 31/01/11 19:11, Udo Waechter wrote:
>
> Do you use storeconfigs?
>
> Speaking of resource hogs, do you run the puppet labs dashboard on the same
> host? I had a similar setup (on crus
Hi,
On 31.01.2011, at 22:43, Brice Figureau wrote:
> On 31/01/11 19:11, Udo Waechter wrote:
>> [..]
>> We use passenger 2.2.11debian-2 and apache 2.2.16-3, ruby1.8 from
>> squeeze.
>
> I see a pattern here. It seems Micah (see a couple of mails above in
> this thread) has about the same setup, e
Hi,
I have one Puppet agent (2.6.3 on Ubuntu) that sometimes does not seem to
survive a reload (SIGHUP). The agent is reloaded by 'logrotate' every
morning, and usually this works OK, but just sometimes, puppetd gives up,
without writing anything extraordinary to syslog (without any debug options)
- Original Message -
> On Jan 31, 10:09 am, Nan Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Gabriel Filion
> > wrote:
> > Yeah, that would make manifests a lot more flexible. Here's a
> > function
> > that should work for this purpose and potentially other puppet
> > configuration v
On Jan 31, 10:09 am, Nan Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Gabriel Filion wrote:
> Yeah, that would make manifests a lot more flexible. Here's a function
> that should work for this purpose and potentially other puppet
> configuration variables as well:
You can also wedge this in to
On Jan 31, 3:05 am, Pieter Baele wrote:
> - doing some sort of check if their recipes / templates work.
A stronger check than --parseonly is to use a tool like cucumber-
puppet. It's very simple to verify that a nodes catalog can actually
compile, not just parse. Additionally you can do things li
37 matches
Mail list logo
