Hello!
I have n mod-proxy servers. I wish to list all mod-proxy entries in the
text file like a:
mod-proxy1 www.example.com example.internal.lan
mod-proxy1 www.example2.com example2.internal.lan
mod-proxy2 www.example3.com example3.internal.lan
..
and via puppet get
on mod-proxy1 server
Hi,
using the following manifests inside a module:
define base_users::usermanagement($gid='', $uid='', $groups='', $comment='',
$home='', $ensure=present) {
if ($comment == '' ) {
fail('need full username')
}
}
when running a test:
tests/init.pp
Hi,
Removing the 'require' link leads back to the very first problem I've
encountered: The files are not regenerated even thought the stored
configurations inside the MySQL database changed (I did check the table
content before.).
Bernd
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:36:26 +0100, Gabriel Filion
Hi,
Is there a way to 'unique-ify' a collection of resources?
Suppose that nodes export '@@nagios_hostgroup' resources for hostgroups
that they want to be a member of. The Nagios server node collect those:
Nagios_hostgroup ||
But many nodes export the same hostgroups, because the whole point
Hi,
I was looking at the basic example for exporting and collecting resources
at http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/exported_resources.html :
class ssh {
@@sshkey { $hostname: type = dsa, key = $sshdsakey }
Sshkey | |
}
I quote:
The above code would have every host export its SSH public
On Nov 17, 2:18 am, Martin Alfke tux...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
using the following manifests inside a module:
define base_users::usermanagement($gid='', $uid='', $groups='', $comment='',
$home='', $ensure=present) {
if ($comment == '' ) {
fail('need full
On 17.11.2011, at 14:49, jcbollinger wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:18 am, Martin Alfke tux...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
using the following manifests inside a module:
define base_users::usermanagement($gid='', $uid='', $groups='', $comment='',
$home='', $ensure=present) {
if ($comment
Anyone from puppetmanaged.org listening to this list ?
The web page to create an account http://www.puppetmanaged.org/user/register
is busted.
The CAPTCHA does not show up and you cannot register without it.
So I tried their mailing list -- http://www.puppetmanaged.org/mailman/listinfo
I was
Hi,
A small addition at the bottom...
I was looking at the basic example for exporting and collecting resources
at http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/exported_resources.html :
class ssh {
@@sshkey { $hostname: type = dsa, key = $sshdsakey }
Sshkey | |
}
I quote:
The above
On 17-11-11 11:51, Martijn Grendelman wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to 'unique-ify' a collection of resources?
Suppose that nodes export '@@nagios_hostgroup' resources for hostgroups
that they want to be a member of. The Nagios server node collect those:
Nagios_hostgroup ||
But many
Hi John,
thanks for your reply, much appreciated.
I recommend that you check whether
it is having the desired effect.
Yeah, I actually double-checked before writing my post, and it did
work just fine ... but I agree with you that the term realize is
semantically questionable. What I actually
I'm trying to use puppet to setup my apache v-hosts. I want to make sure
the files are in order so my puppet statement is this:
file { apache-vhost-$name:
path= /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/$order-$name,
content = template(apache/vhost.erb),
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:04:09AM -0800, Jon Davis wrote:
I'm trying to use puppet to setup my apache v-hosts. I want to make sure
the files are in order so my puppet statement is this:
� � � � file { apache-vhost-$name:
� � � � � � � � path � �=
That did it, thanks. I couldn't find any examples of variable isolation
in puppet, but going back now I realize there were... I just missed em.
Much appreciated
-Jon
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:10, Christopher Wood
christopher_w...@pobox.comwrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:04:09AM -0800, Jon
Thanks for the feedback. I do see the same behavior and I no longer need to
do this but I am confused by your suggestion to not use += even though it's
a valid Puppet capability.
My simplified example was actually based on a parameterized activemq class.
In my MCollective server's node definition
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 06:54 -0800, jcbollinger wrote:
Starting in Puppet 2.8, however, it will be mandatory to refer to non-
local variables by their fully-qualified names. In preparation for
that, Puppet 2.7.x emits warning when your manifests resolve non-local
variables from the dynamic
Hi,
I am using Puppet 2.6.1 on Ubuntu LTS and i am getting this strange
error messages.
Duplicate definition: File[conf] is already defined in file /etc/
puppet/modules/apache2/manifests/vhost.pp at line 10; cannot redefine
at /etc/puppet/modules/apache2/manifests/vhost.pp:10 on node
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Markus Falb wne...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16.Nov.2011, at 08:58, Ohad Levy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Nov 9, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
Ruby 1.87 support
Foreman 0.4 would be the last major
On Nov 15, 2011, at 9:47 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
This allows the end user of the ntp module to establish require and
before relationships easily:
class { 'ntp': } - class { 'mcollective': }
class { 'mcollective': } - class { 'ntp': }
I assume these two statements are mutually
On Nov 15, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Brian Gupta wrote:
Not speaking for Ohad here, but I do know that rails 3.x would have major
issues with Ruby versions = 1.8.6, and are explicitly not supported. As it
stands foreman is not alone here, as puppetlabs is not supporting ruby 1.8.5
for the latest
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
if its not clear, what it means, is that if you want to run it on
RHEL5, you can either keep running the current 0.4.x versions or
upgrade your ruby stack. otherwise use a more recent distribution.
Given that upgrading the ruby stack means
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Peter Horvath wrote:
Duplicate definition: File[conf] is already defined in file /etc/
puppet/modules/apache2/manifests/vhost.pp at line 10; cannot redefine
at /etc/puppet/modules/apache2/manifests/vhost.pp:10 on node
eurwebtest02
Do you have any idea what
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
if its not clear, what it means, is that if you want to run it on
RHEL5, you can either keep running the current 0.4.x versions or
upgrade your ruby stack. otherwise use a
Hi Dan,
I used to participate in this project, but i don't know if the project
owner is on the list. I don't want to pronounce the project dead, but
it's been pretty inactive lately.
-Yaakov
2011/11/17 Dan White y...@comcast.net:
Anyone from puppetmanaged.org listening to this list ?
The web
Hi all,
I have
define vhost($vhost,$db){
user { apache : name = apache, groups = $title , require =
User[$title],}...
}
and in nodes.pp
node 'myhost' {
wg::web::vhost { foo: vhost = vhost1, db = db1 }
wg::web::vhost { bar: vhost = vhost1, db = db2 }
}
In case of 2 vhosts
Thanks for responding.
I found the project while looking for a recipe for iptables.
Have you used the one there ? It looks like it has all the bells and whistles
I need, but there are some features that I do not understand.
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Dan White y...@comcast.net wrote:
Thanks for responding.
I found the project while looking for a recipe for iptables.
Have you used the one there ? It looks like it has all the bells and
whistles I need, but there are some features that I do not understand.
On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
if its not clear, what it means, is that if you want to run it on
RHEL5, you can either keep running the current 0.4.x
We have been working on going through the list of submitted patches in
Patchwork[0], and the open pull requests in GitHub[1][2][3]. There has
been activity on a number of them, but not all with activity have
resulted in merged changes.
We also recently finished work on a fix for the problem of
i know all of this and i did grep before i wrote this email :)
There is no other file[conf]
On 17 November 2011 18:58, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Peter Horvath wrote:
Duplicate definition: File[conf] is already defined in file /etc/
Tech documentation is littered with examples that illustrate exactly
one thing and call it day. 99% of the power of any system comes from
learning to combine multiple functions. I chose that example because
it illustrates regex, using regex in a node as well as case
statements, adding classes
Well, I've really started trying this the day after, but it took some time
to get the final solution and a reliable system working. I'm also still
struggling with another problem I've already posted on this list
(nagios_service does not replace target file). Both is now covered in my
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Nov 15, 2011, at 9:47 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
This allows the end user of the ntp module to establish require and
before relationships easily:
class { 'ntp': } - class { 'mcollective': }
class {
On 11-11-17 04:04 AM, Bernd Adamowicz wrote:
Removing the 'require' link leads back to the very first problem I've
encountered: The files are not regenerated even thought the stored
configurations inside the MySQL database changed (I did check the table
content before.).
hmm right, sorry you
The rsync process does definitely not disturb the generation of the files.
I've checked this several times. However I will have a look at the module
mentioned by you as soon as I'm back in the office on Monday. Maybe I'll
find some issues.
Thanks so far!
Bernd
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011
On Nov 17, 1:50 pm, Peter Horvath peter.horvat...@gmail.com wrote:
i know all of this and i did grep before i wrote this email :)
There is no other file[conf]
In that case, the one declaration must be processed twice. It must
appear inside a defined type that you instantiate more than once.
On Nov 17, 11:38 am, Davide Ferrari davide.ferr...@atrapalo.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 06:54 -0800, jcbollinger wrote:
Starting in Puppet 2.8, however, it will be mandatory to refer to non-
local variables by their fully-qualified names. In preparation for
that, Puppet 2.7.x emits
On Nov 17, 11:23 am, Justin Lloyd jstn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. I do see the same behavior and I no longer need to
do this but I am confused by your suggestion to not use += even though it's
a valid Puppet capability.
The C language has a standard feature referred to as
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
if its not clear, what it means, is that if you
I'm not sure about the Ruby packages specifically, but Fedora has
diverged so much from RHEL5 that building recent packages is a major
undertaking. You'd probably be better off with tarballs and FPM.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17,
To Mike's point, I backported from f13 or 14 SRPMs - can't remember which -
with great regularity and very little problem to RHEL 5.
Haven't done it in ages but it's not too bad. And where that fails, gem2rpm…
-Eric
--
Eric Shamow
Professional Services
http://puppetlabs.com/
On Nov 17, 10:57 am, Stephan stephan.eckwei...@admin.ox.ac.uk wrote:
Hi John,
thanks for your reply, much appreciated.
I recommend that you check whether
it is having the desired effect.
Yeah, I actually double-checked before writing my post, and it did
work just fine ... but I agree
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Stephan
stephan.eckwei...@admin.ox.ac.uk wrote:
Hi all,
here is what I have:
A module that is responsible to roll out and configure TSM (a backup
tool). Basically I need a text file that mentions all directories that
have to be backed up. I want to make it a
C:\Users\ml623puppet --version
2.7.7
Puppet complains about a package resource I am trying to use saying:
Invalid parameter install_options
The resource is defined as:
package { splunk:
name = $gu_splunk::client::splunk_package,
provider = 'msi',
ensure = installed,
On 17 Nov 2011 22:42, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
A while back you could just take the srpms from Fedora's 1.8.7 and
they would build pretty easily on EL5. I haven't tried that for a
while, but you can at least get the RPMs from a known source that way.
SRPMs from EL6 (which
45 matches
Mail list logo
