On 10/07/2012 11:28 PM, Sandra Schlichting wrote:
I know for that practice, but the problem is that it makes upgrade from
samba to samba3x packages a problem. So I would rather avoid that with
the puppet. And if you know how to add puppetlabs repo to yum, then
you'll know how to
On 10/03/2012 08:38 PM, Aaron Russo wrote:
Personally, I would have liked to see a separate repo for each version
of puppet (so that users of 2.6.x, 2.7.x and 3.0.x could continue to
receive the latest and greatest for their version). But I also don't
have to manage the thing, so I respect
Well, in many enterprise distro having different name and, possibly,
no conflicting path for a complex package is a common option. In
rhel5 for example exists samba package for samba 3.0.x and samba3x for
samba 3.x , and samba it is often a critical package and the change
between different
On 10/07/2012 07:30 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
Well, in many enterprise distro having different name and, possibly,
no conflicting path for a complex package is a common option. In
rhel5 for example exists samba package for samba 3.0.x and samba3x for
samba 3.x , and samba it is often a critical
I know for that practice, but the problem is that it makes upgrade from
samba to samba3x packages a problem. So I would rather avoid that with
the puppet. And if you know how to add puppetlabs repo to yum, then
you'll know how to choose what version repo to use. Just take a look at
Hi Chad
* Take a look at the yum versionlock plugin. My life has been much
simpler since I deployed it. For a while I was excludeing puppet
and friends in yum.conf, but that was a real pain. The versionlock
plugin pins a package at the version you want, and then you can
update when
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 1:36:22 AM UTC+1, Michael Stanhke wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Jeff McCune
je...@puppetlabs.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Robert Rothenberg
rob...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I am using CentOS 6 with the PuppetLabs
On 2 Oct 2012, at 21:17, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
I am using CentOS 6 with the PuppetLabs yum repo from
http://yum.puppetlabs.com
I noticed that today version 3 is available on the repo, so of course, an
upgrade to Puppet is available.
Ideally, it would have been better if v3 had a
On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 7:36:22 PM UTC-5, Michael Stanhke wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Jeff McCune
je...@puppetlabs.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Robert Rothenberg
rob...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I am using CentOS 6 with the PuppetLabs
I usually explicitly set the $puppetversion in my manifest for my environment.
Furthermore, I have my own mirror copied from puppet labs repo and install it
from that location instead. That way, I have control of what I push out and
only update when I know that the new version is sound.
So I
- Original Message -
From: Rilindo Foster rili...@mac.com
To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 3:02:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 2.7 v 3.0 in the PuppetLabs yum repo
I usually explicitly set the $puppetversion in my manifest for my
On 3 October 2012 15:02, Rilindo Foster rili...@mac.com wrote:
I usually explicitly set the $puppetversion in my manifest for my
environment. Furthermore, I have my own mirror copied from puppet labs repo
and install it from that location instead. That way, I have control of what
I push out
I agree that folks should manage their repos, but I wanted to throw in
a couple of thoughts:
* The package name hacks (eg puppet3) are usually done by
distributions to allow multiple versions of software to co-exist.
* Take a look at the yum versionlock plugin. My life has been much
simpler
On 3 October 2012 15:51, Chad Huneycutt chad.huneyc...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that folks should manage their repos, but I wanted to throw in
a couple of thoughts:
* The package name hacks (eg puppet3) are usually done by
distributions to allow multiple versions of software to co-exist.
I
It might be worth an enhancement request to have Package: ensure = version
call yum versionlock or zypper add-lock if they are present
On Oct 3, 2012 10:55 AM, Mister Guru misteritg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 October 2012 15:51, Chad Huneycutt chad.huneyc...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that folks
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 3:51:28 PM UTC+1, Chad Huneycutt wrote:
I agree that folks should manage their repos, but I wanted to throw in
a couple of thoughts:
* The package name hacks (eg puppet3) are usually done by
distributions to allow multiple versions of software to co-exist.
+1
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Rilindo Foster rili...@mac.com wrote:
I usually explicitly set the $puppetversion in my manifest for my
environment. Furthermore, I have my own mirror copied from puppet labs repo
and install it from that location instead. That way, I have control of what
I
full disclosure: I don't use the puppetlabs repos. Below are just some
observations and concerns I wanted to voice.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Jeff McCune j...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:17
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 9:24:01 AM UTC-5, R.I. Pienaar wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rilindo Foster ril...@mac.com javascript:
To: puppet...@googlegroups.com javascript:
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 3:02:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 2.7 v 3.0
- Original Message -
From: R.I.Pienaar r...@devco.net
To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 8:25:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 2.7 v 3.0 in the PuppetLabs yum repo
- Original Message -
From: jcbollinger john.bollin
I am using CentOS 6 with the PuppetLabs yum repo from
http://yum.puppetlabs.com
I noticed that today version 3 is available on the repo, so of course, an
upgrade to Puppet is available.
Ideally, it would have been better if v3 had a different distribution name,
so that systems with v2.7.x are
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Robert Rothenberg rob...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using CentOS 6 with the PuppetLabs yum repo from
http://yum.puppetlabs.com
I noticed that today version 3 is available on the repo, so of course, an
upgrade to Puppet is available.
Yes, this major version update
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Jeff McCune j...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Robert Rothenberg rob...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using CentOS 6 with the PuppetLabs yum repo from
http://yum.puppetlabs.com
I noticed that today version 3 is available on the repo, so of
23 matches
Mail list logo
