Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-06-01 Thread Garrett Honeycutt
On 5/23/14, 4:31 AM, Paul Seymour wrote: > Hello, > > Just updated the test environment to 3.6.1 and I know the changes have > been made for virtual packages. But now each agent output displays this:- > > Warning: The package type's allow_virtual parameter will be changing its > default value fro

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-29 Thread Andy Parker
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Kylo Ginsberg wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Andy Parker wrote: > >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Kylo Ginsberg >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Chuck wrote: >>> The ability to turn off the deprecation messages would be gre

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-29 Thread Clayton O'Neill
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Kylo Ginsberg wrote: > I think a 'deprecation-level' setting might be more in keeping with >> logging. It defaults to warn, but can be turned down to debug if you don't >> want to normally see them. >> >> > This seems like it might cause some confusion if users a

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-29 Thread Kylo Ginsberg
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Andy Parker wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Kylo Ginsberg > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Chuck wrote: >> >>> The ability to turn off the deprecation messages would be great. The >>> only things these messages provide are a drain on lo

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-28 Thread Andy Parker
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Kylo Ginsberg wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Chuck wrote: > >> The ability to turn off the deprecation messages would be great. The >> only things these messages provide are a drain on logging resources, noise >> in the logs, and confusion from end u

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-27 Thread Kylo Ginsberg
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Chuck wrote: > The ability to turn off the deprecation messages would be great. The only > things these messages provide are a drain on logging resources, noise in > the logs, and confusion from end users. > > Seems like we have consensus on an ignore-deprecation

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-27 Thread Chuck
The ability to turn off the deprecation messages would be great. The only things these messages provide are a drain on logging resources, noise in the logs, and confusion from end users. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsu

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-27 Thread jcbollinger
On Friday, May 23, 2014 2:37:16 PM UTC-5, Rob Reynolds wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Kylo Ginsberg > > > wrote: > >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Paul Seymour >> > wrote: >> >>> +1 - let's file a bug report. >>> >>> https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PU

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-27 Thread Felix Frank
On 05/23/2014 07:00 PM, Kylo Ginsberg wrote: > The downside to (2) is it's Yet Another Setting and as such it might not > be used as much (i.e. puppet 4 might take more people by surprise). Sure enough, but looking at all the breaking changes looming on the Puppet 4 horizon, the release notes will

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-23 Thread Rob Reynolds
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Kylo Ginsberg wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Paul Seymour wrote: > >> >>> +1 - let's file a bug report. >>> >> >> https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-2650 >> > > For more context here, puppet has a 'deprecation_warning' method which is > used fo

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-23 Thread Kylo Ginsberg
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Paul Seymour wrote: > >> +1 - let's file a bug report. >> > > https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-2650 > For more context here, puppet has a 'deprecation_warning' method which is used for this new message and also in a number of other places. In puppet 3.7,

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-23 Thread Paul Seymour
> > > +1 - let's file a bug report. > https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-2650 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr..

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-23 Thread Peter Meier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> I know we can set a top level default but does that really have >> to come out constantly ? > > I agree, I was thinking of filing a bug for this to request that > it's dialled down to info or notice level, if it must be printed at > all. > > Depre

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-23 Thread Dominic Cleal
On 23/05/14 09:31, Paul Seymour wrote: > Just updated the test environment to 3.6.1 and I know the changes have > been made for virtual packages. But now each agent output displays this:- > > Warning: The package type's allow_virtual parameter will be changing its > default value from false to tru

[Puppet Users] Puppet 3.6.1 Virtual Packages, and unrelated facts questions...

2014-05-23 Thread Paul Seymour
Hello, Just updated the test environment to 3.6.1 and I know the changes have been made for virtual packages. But now each agent output displays this:- Warning: The package type's allow_virtual parameter will be changing its default value from false to true in a future release. If you do not wa