James Turnbull writes:
> Daniel Pittman wrote:
>
>> I suggest you look to replacing webrick with one of the other options that
>> give multiple, load balanced puppetmasters. Passenger and 0.25.* work well
>> for me, but bugs with that have me holding off the 2.6 series for now
>
> Are there t
Daniel Pittman wrote:
> I suggest you look to replacing webrick with one of the other options that
> give multiple, load balanced puppetmasters. Passenger and 0.25.* work well
> for me, but bugs with that have me holding off the 2.6 series for now
>
Daniel
Are there tickets logged for the i
Jomo writes:
> I host about 700 directories and 1300 files on the puppetmaster
> server, using default Webrick server.
I believe the standard response is "get a better server"; the default is
really not well optimized for high volume loads — and while this is a high
volume of file traffic, not m
I host about 700 directories and 1300 files on the puppetmaster
server, using default Webrick server. On the client, it takes about 6
minutes to get these files, and responses lots of errors which like
"Failed to retrieve current state of resource" :(
--
You received this message because you are
