[Puppet Users] Re: Researching Puppet - Local host variations

2012-02-21 Thread thinkwell
I'm getting this worked through in my head, I think. I wanted to make sure that Puppet would totally support me if the migration is made. I've concluded that I can standardize a bit more than I have, and with Daniel's suggestion, quoted below, I'm well impressed! : file {

[Puppet Users] Re: Researching Puppet - Local host variations

2012-02-08 Thread jcbollinger
On Feb 7, 8:17 am, thinkwell thinkwelldesi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, First-time poster investigating Puppet for managing CentOS-based firewall distros at various locations. I have approximately 130 machines to administrate so some type of config management is certainly needed.

[Puppet Users] Re: Researching Puppet - Local host variations

2012-02-08 Thread jcbollinger
On Feb 8, 12:39 pm, Daniel Pittman dan...@puppetlabs.com wrote: Ultimately, though, you are *seeing* the problem you already had, just laid out in a way that calls attention to it. +1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post

[Puppet Users] Re: Researching Puppet - Local host variations

2012-02-07 Thread Ramin K
On Feb 7, 6:17 am, thinkwell thinkwelldesi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, 2. Squid ACLs: All machines will have certain Squid ACLs, but many machines will vary otherwise, say in cache size for example. In regards to #2 on your list it's pretty easy to do stuff like this if you're running