Larizza"
To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 11:31:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Sanity Check Request: Environments in
/etc/puppet/puppet.conf
Yep,
Off the top of my head, you would most likely just want to manage the
following:
* server
* certname
*
s.”
> Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes)
>
> --
> *From: *"Peter Brown"
> *To: *"puppet-users"
> *Sent: *Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:22:08 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Puppet Users] Sanity Check Request: Environments in
> /etc/puppet
is that none of it has tried to contact us.”
Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes)
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Brown"
To: "puppet-users"
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:22:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Sanity Check Request: Environments in
/etc/pup
On 24 January 2013 06:20, Dan White wrote:
> It just struck me that any environment blocks in /etc/puppet/puppet.conf
> have meaning ONLY on the puppet master.
>
> Is that accurate ?
>
Pretty much.
I am reasonably sure the only thing you can put in there is manifest and
module paths.
It basicall
It just struck me that any environment blocks in /etc/puppet/puppet.conf have
meaning ONLY on the puppet master.
Is that accurate ?
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in
the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.”
Bill Waterson (Calvin &
