On 24 July 2012 00:43, Ryan Bowlby rbowlb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone comment on their experiences with librarian-puppet or using git
superproject with per puppet module repositories? We are in the midst of
determining which route is optimal for our environment. It seems like using
git
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Dan Bode d...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Ryan Bowlby rbowlb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone comment on their experiences with librarian-puppet or using
git superproject with per puppet module repositories?
I tried using git
Thanks all, we've decided to stick with git super project and per module
repositories. Some of the modules will be a clone from github, but most are
internal. It seems to suit our needs and we don't see a reason to implement
librarian-puppet.
Ohad, I setup pulp at work and it's pretty good
Can anyone comment on their experiences with librarian-puppet or using git
superproject with per puppet module repositories? We are in the midst of
determining which route is optimal for our environment. It seems like using
git superprojects would mean one less new tool for everyone to learn.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Ryan Bowlby rbowlb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone comment on their experiences with librarian-puppet or using git
superproject with per puppet module repositories?
I tried using git submodules for a long time. I found that I just could not
keep up with
