Re: [Puppet Users] mcollective reload-agents unreliable?

2015-11-19 Thread Lorcan Hamill
> > it really doesn't, in ways you cant even see or debug and cannot work. > Don't use it. > > Only option is to restart the daemon. > Okay, we'll just have to figure out a way to live with that, I guess. Thanks. -- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended

Re: [Puppet Users] mcollective reload-agents unreliable?

2015-11-19 Thread R.I.Pienaar
- Original Message - > From: "Lorcan Hamill" > To: "puppet-users" > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:41:34 AM > Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] mcollective reload-agents unreliable? > Thanks for the quick reply! > > yes, I actually though

Re: [Puppet Users] mcollective reload-agents unreliable?

2015-11-19 Thread Lorcan Hamill
Thanks for the quick reply! yes, I actually thought that feature got removed since it's not usuable and > never really worked at all. > > Don't use it. > It seems to work okay most of the time, as far as I can tell. The trouble comes if it is used when the daemon is: 1) Still getting initial

Re: [Puppet Users] mcollective reload-agents unreliable?

2015-11-18 Thread R.I.Pienaar
- Original Message - > From: "Lorcan Hamill" > To: "puppet-users" > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:02:31 PM > Subject: [Puppet Users] mcollective reload-agents unreliable? > Is reload-agents known to be unreliable, if mcollective has lost its S

[Puppet Users] mcollective reload-agents unreliable?

2015-11-18 Thread Lorcan Hamill
Is reload-agents known to be unreliable, if mcollective has lost its STOMP connection? Let me explain...: When I run "/etc/init.d/mcollective reload-agents", it sends a USR1 signal to mcollectived to cause it to reload its agents. Usually, this works fine. But if I do this when the mcollecti